Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.5.19 encounters157,189 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #101 | 3,563.913,564Aggregate Score 52.73 | 0.38%Aggregate Score 89.77 | 67.5567.5 | 592 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #102 | 3,874.003,874Aggregate Score 97.47 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.51 | 67.4867.5 | 30 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #103 | 3,582.833,583Aggregate Score 51.84 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 90.79 | 67.4267.4 | 663 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #104 | 3,675.103,675Aggregate Score 69.15 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 64.45 | 67.2767.3 | 144 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #105 | 3,748.203,748Aggregate Score 88.06 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.81 | 67.1667.2 | 30 teams1 / 6 encounters | ||
| #106 | 3,763.323,763Aggregate Score 90.30 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 32.23 | 67.0767.1 | 25 teams1 / 6 encounters | ||
| #107 | 3,682.883,683Aggregate Score 82.07 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 44.50 | 67.0467.0 | 69 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #108 | 3,679.583,680Aggregate Score 65.58 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 68.80 | 66.8766.9 | 178 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #109 | 3,587.183,587Aggregate Score 48.86 | 0.59%Aggregate Score 93.61 | 66.7666.8 | 606 teams3 / 6 encounters | ||
| #110 | 3,830.143,830Aggregate Score 94.78 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 24.55 | 66.6966.7 | 21 teams1 / 6 encounters | ||
| #111 | 3,797.633,798Aggregate Score 88.04 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 33.76 | 66.3366.3 | 41 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #112 | 3,551.463,551Aggregate Score 47.78 | 0.61%Aggregate Score 94.12 | 66.3166.3 | 628 teams3 / 6 encounters | ||
| #113 | 3,879.643,880Aggregate Score 98.73 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 17.14 | 66.0966.1 | 25 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #114 | 3,560.073,560Aggregate Score 51.32 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 87.72 | 65.8865.9 | 522 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #115 | 3,696.283,696Aggregate Score 74.72 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 52.17 | 65.7065.7 | 57 teams2 / 6 encounters | ||
| #116 | 3,715.073,715Aggregate Score 82.09 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.92 | 65.6265.6 | 41 teams1 / 6 encounters | ||
| #117 | 3,806.283,806Aggregate Score 89.13 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 29.67 | 65.3565.3 | 36 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #118 | 3,554.693,555Aggregate Score 46.79 | 0.55%Aggregate Score 93.09 | 65.3165.3 | 566 teams4 / 6 encounters | ||
| #119 | 3,830.143,830Aggregate Score 95.06 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.46 | 65.2265.2 | 28 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #120 | 3,558.533,559Aggregate Score 50.62 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 86.96 | 65.1565.2 | 474 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #121 | 3,618.423,618Aggregate Score 49.74 | 0.31%Aggregate Score 87.47 | 64.8364.8 | 494 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #122 | 3,525.073,525Aggregate Score 43.19 | 1.57%Aggregate Score 96.93 | 64.6964.7 | 2,474 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #123 | 3,822.473,822Aggregate Score 92.59 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.51 | 64.5664.6 | 30 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #124 | 3,719.153,719Aggregate Score 82.84 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.08 | 64.5464.5 | 52 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #125 | 3,557.393,557Aggregate Score 52.64 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 82.35 | 64.5364.5 | 344 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #126 | 3,583.543,584Aggregate Score 40.81 | 4.19%Aggregate Score 99.49 | 64.2864.3 | 6,581 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #127 | 3,593.823,594Aggregate Score 56.28 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 75.70 | 64.0564.0 | 237 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #128 | 3,863.323,863Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.72 | 63.8963.9 | 22 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #128 | 3,991.453,991Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.72 | 63.8963.9 | 22 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #130 | 3,623.303,623Aggregate Score 53.86 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 78.77 | 63.8363.8 | 281 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #131 | 3,709.713,710Aggregate Score 86.25 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 30.18 | 63.8263.8 | 24 teams1 / 6 encounters | ||
| #132 | 3,805.643,806Aggregate Score 92.54 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.46 | 63.7163.7 | 28 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #133 | 3,575.843,576Aggregate Score 53.62 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 78.77 | 63.6863.7 | 281 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #134 | 3,553.283,553Aggregate Score 49.82 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 84.14 | 63.5563.5 | 257 teams2 / 6 encounters | ||
| #135 | 3,807.583,808Aggregate Score 88.61 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 25.32 | 63.2963.3 | 33 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #136 | 3,571.373,571Aggregate Score 53.26 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 78.26 | 63.2663.3 | 81 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #137 | 3,857.003,857Aggregate Score 96.74 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 12.53 | 63.0663.1 | 23 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #138 | 3,660.863,661Aggregate Score 73.91 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 46.55 | 62.9763.0 | 21 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #139 | 3,779.793,780Aggregate Score 90.71 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 21.23 | 62.9262.9 | 29 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #140 | 3,748.583,749Aggregate Score 89.29 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 23.27 | 62.8862.9 | 31 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #141 | 3,603.543,604Aggregate Score 58.79 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 67.52 | 62.2862.3 | 111 teams2 / 6 encounters | ||
| #142 | 3,842.333,842Aggregate Score 93.48 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 15.09 | 62.1262.1 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #143 | 3,566.043,566Aggregate Score 47.51 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 83.38 | 61.8561.9 | 373 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #144 | 3,823.893,824Aggregate Score 89.87 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 19.69 | 61.8061.8 | 27 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #145 | 3,909.863,910Aggregate Score 98.91 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 5.88 | 61.7061.7 | 21 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #146 | 3,547.663,548Aggregate Score 44.65 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 87.21 | 61.6761.7 | 312 teams2 / 6 encounters | ||
| #147 | 3,602.023,602Aggregate Score 61.68 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 61.38 | 61.5661.6 | 130 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #148 | 3,618.053,618Aggregate Score 59.41 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 64.71 | 61.5361.5 | 146 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #149 | 3,541.593,542Aggregate Score 37.79 | 1.11%Aggregate Score 96.42 | 61.2461.2 | 1,749 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #150 | 3,574.493,574Aggregate Score 44.37 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 86.45 | 61.2061.2 | 301 teams3 / 6 encounters |
