Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.6.19 encounters137,006 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #241 | 8.948.94Aggregate Score 11.37 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.34 | 26.9627.0 | 86 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #240 | 7.637.63Aggregate Score 36.56 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 13.45 | 27.3127.3 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #239 | 8.008.00Aggregate Score 40.26 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 9.31 | 27.8827.9 | 22 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #238 | 8.648.64Aggregate Score 24.79 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 33.10 | 28.1128.1 | 44 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #237 | 9.059.05Aggregate Score 8.59 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 60.69 | 29.4329.4 | 139 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #236 | 8.758.75Aggregate Score 21.12 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 42.07 | 29.5029.5 | 67 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #235 | 10.4110.41Aggregate Score 0.77 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 72.76 | 29.5629.6 | 212 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #234 | 8.388.38Aggregate Score 29.91 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.31 | 29.6729.7 | 39 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #233 | 8.948.94Aggregate Score 17.97 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.66 | 30.6430.6 | 83 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #232 | 8.488.48Aggregate Score 22.13 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 43.45 | 30.6630.7 | 69 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #231 | 8.398.39Aggregate Score 22.58 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 43.45 | 30.9330.9 | 69 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #230 | 7.357.35Aggregate Score 50.43 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.76 | 31.3631.4 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #229 | 9.899.89Aggregate Score 2.46 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 74.83 | 31.4131.4 | 255 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #228 | 8.658.65Aggregate Score 22.27 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 45.86 | 31.7131.7 | 78 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #227 | 9.019.01Aggregate Score 14.54 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 57.93 | 31.9031.9 | 120 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #226 | 8.778.77Aggregate Score 19.19 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 51.03 | 31.9331.9 | 88 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #225 | 8.108.10Aggregate Score 14.29 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 59.66 | 32.4332.4 | 39 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #224 | 7.807.80Aggregate Score 30.03 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 36.21 | 32.5032.5 | 50 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #223 | 9.439.43Aggregate Score 9.00 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 67.93 | 32.5732.6 | 187 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #222 | 7.007.00Aggregate Score 52.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.76 | 32.7232.7 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #221 | 8.838.83Aggregate Score 22.22 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 48.62 | 32.7832.8 | 82 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #220 | 7.477.47Aggregate Score 28.30 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 40.00 | 32.9833.0 | 64 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #219 | 9.149.14Aggregate Score 10.77 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 66.55 | 33.0833.1 | 176 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #218 | 7.787.78Aggregate Score 44.44 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 17.59 | 33.7033.7 | 27 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #217 | 8.768.76Aggregate Score 21.74 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 51.72 | 33.7333.7 | 90 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #216 | 7.297.29Aggregate Score 52.14 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 6.55 | 33.9033.9 | 21 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #215 | 7.557.55Aggregate Score 50.65 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 9.31 | 34.1134.1 | 22 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #214 | 8.438.43Aggregate Score 22.85 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 51.03 | 34.1234.1 | 88 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #213 | 9.009.00Aggregate Score 14.93 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 63.45 | 34.3434.3 | 159 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #212 | 8.868.86Aggregate Score 18.79 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 58.28 | 34.5834.6 | 121 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #211 | 9.089.08Aggregate Score 14.90 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 64.48 | 34.7334.7 | 163 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #210 | 9.709.70Aggregate Score 4.85 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 79.66 | 34.7734.8 | 327 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #209 | 7.907.90Aggregate Score 17.46 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 61.03 | 34.8934.9 | 41 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #208 | 9.049.04Aggregate Score 13.01 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.28 | 35.1235.1 | 188 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #207 | 9.599.59Aggregate Score 6.67 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 78.28 | 35.3135.3 | 296 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #206 | 8.838.83Aggregate Score 18.65 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 63.10 | 36.4336.4 | 157 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #205 | 7.327.32Aggregate Score 51.95 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.83 | 37.1037.1 | 25 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #204 | 8.188.18Aggregate Score 31.29 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 45.86 | 37.1237.1 | 78 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #203 | 7.907.90Aggregate Score 41.88 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 30.34 | 37.2737.3 | 40 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #202 | 9.089.08Aggregate Score 12.66 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 75.86 | 37.9437.9 | 260 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #201 | 8.258.25Aggregate Score 31.81 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.24 | 37.9838.0 | 79 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #200 | 7.717.71Aggregate Score 45.30 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.59 | 38.2138.2 | 34 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #199 | 7.007.00Aggregate Score 58.12 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 9.31 | 38.6038.6 | 22 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #198 | 7.217.21Aggregate Score 55.84 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 13.45 | 38.8938.9 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #197 | 7.857.85Aggregate Score 26.92 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 57.59 | 39.1839.2 | 119 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #196 | 8.378.37Aggregate Score 24.18 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 61.72 | 39.2039.2 | 142 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #195 | 7.337.33Aggregate Score 40.86 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 37.93 | 39.6939.7 | 54 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #194 | 8.468.46Aggregate Score 18.44 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 72.76 | 40.1740.2 | 212 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #193 | 7.477.47Aggregate Score 45.99 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 31.72 | 40.2940.3 | 43 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #192 | 8.548.54Aggregate Score 19.63 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 71.38 | 40.3340.3 | 206 teams5 / 9 encounters |
