Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #251 | 3.653.65Aggregate Score 11.01 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 39.78 | 22.5222.5 | 63 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #252 | 3.413.41Aggregate Score 18.81 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 25.18 | 21.3621.4 | 37 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #253 | 3.893.89Aggregate Score 3.59 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.81 | 21.2821.3 | 90 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #254 | 3.753.75Aggregate Score 16.17 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 28.10 | 20.9420.9 | 40 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #255 | 3.183.18Aggregate Score 30.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 6.20 | 20.9020.9 | 22 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #256 | 3.303.30Aggregate Score 4.86 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 41.61 | 19.5619.6 | 70 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #257 | 2.582.58Aggregate Score 21.62 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 18.8118.8 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #258 | 3.423.42Aggregate Score 4.11 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.51 | 18.6718.7 | 64 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #259 | 2.982.98Aggregate Score 9.82 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.56 | 17.7117.7 | 43 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #260 | 3.253.25Aggregate Score 27.72 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 17.5117.5 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #261 | 2.782.78Aggregate Score 22.41 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 17.2417.2 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #262 | 3.423.42Aggregate Score 17.82 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 16.5316.5 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #263 | 2.962.96Aggregate Score 16.50 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.42 | 16.4716.5 | 28 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #264 | 3.983.98Aggregate Score 2.29 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.40 | 15.5315.5 | 53 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #265 | 4.254.25Aggregate Score 23.44 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 14.9414.9 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #266 | 2.842.84Aggregate Score 10.53 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.98 | 13.9113.9 | 32 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #267 | 3.393.39Aggregate Score 16.35 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 13.6013.6 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #268 | 4.484.48Aggregate Score 1.68 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 31.02 | 13.4213.4 | 46 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #269 | 3.353.35Aggregate Score 17.31 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 11.2611.3 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #270 | 3.463.46Aggregate Score 7.77 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 10.5010.5 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #271 | 3.523.52Aggregate Score 13.86 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 10.0710.1 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #272 | 4.044.04Aggregate Score 0.97 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 15.33 | 6.716.7 | 27 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #273 | 4.314.31Aggregate Score 0.00 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 5.845.8 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #274 | 4.424.42Aggregate Score 0.96 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 10.58 | 4.814.8 | 24 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #275 | 3.503.50Aggregate Score 5.83 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 4.374.4 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters |
