Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #175 | 1.231.23Aggregate Score 72.37 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 6.20 | 45.9045.9 | 22 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #174 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 70.30 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 45.9746.0 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #173 | 1.101.10Aggregate Score 73.91 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 46.1046.1 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #172 | 2.432.43Aggregate Score 37.49 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.85 | 46.4446.4 | 87 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #171 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 55.58 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 32.85 | 46.4946.5 | 48 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #170 | 2.892.89Aggregate Score 37.85 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.49 | 46.5046.5 | 147 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #169 | 1.141.14Aggregate Score 75.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 46.7546.8 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #168 | 2.982.98Aggregate Score 20.01 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 86.86 | 46.7546.8 | 700 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #167 | 2.472.47Aggregate Score 51.28 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.51 | 46.9747.0 | 64 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #166 | 2.712.71Aggregate Score 40.13 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 58.03 | 47.2947.3 | 134 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #165 | 2.622.62Aggregate Score 46.45 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.27 | 47.5847.6 | 96 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #164 | 0.900.90Aggregate Score 67.35 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 47.7147.7 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #163 | 2.652.65Aggregate Score 29.01 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 76.28 | 47.9247.9 | 310 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #162 | 2.082.08Aggregate Score 45.36 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.19 | 48.0948.1 | 106 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #161 | 2.992.99Aggregate Score 18.42 | 0.80%Aggregate Score 92.70 | 48.1348.1 | 1,306 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #160 | 1.351.35Aggregate Score 79.61 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 48.6448.6 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #159 | 2.082.08Aggregate Score 51.38 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.89 | 48.7848.8 | 49 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #158 | 1.481.48Aggregate Score 69.23 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 19.34 | 49.2849.3 | 33 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #157 | 2.952.95Aggregate Score 28.94 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 79.93 | 49.3349.3 | 410 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #156 | 2.122.12Aggregate Score 60.21 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 34.31 | 49.8549.8 | 52 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #155 | 2.652.65Aggregate Score 32.29 | 0.20%Aggregate Score 76.64 | 50.0350.0 | 324 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #154 | 1.871.87Aggregate Score 51.91 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.81 | 50.2750.3 | 90 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #153 | 0.870.87Aggregate Score 78.26 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 50.7550.8 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #152 | 1.851.85Aggregate Score 63.46 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 31.75 | 50.7850.8 | 47 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #151 | 3.023.02Aggregate Score 28.13 | 0.40%Aggregate Score 85.04 | 50.8950.9 | 648 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #150 | 2.792.79Aggregate Score 34.72 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 75.18 | 50.9150.9 | 291 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #148 | 0.760.76Aggregate Score 82.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 51.3751.4 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #148 | 0.760.76Aggregate Score 82.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 51.3751.4 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #147 | 2.642.64Aggregate Score 49.68 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 55.47 | 52.0052.0 | 72 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #146 | 2.912.91Aggregate Score 23.16 | 1.89%Aggregate Score 96.35 | 52.4452.4 | 3,076 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #145 | 1.431.43Aggregate Score 63.82 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.40 | 52.4552.5 | 53 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #144 | 0.930.93Aggregate Score 76.92 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.42 | 52.7252.7 | 28 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #143 | 3.093.09Aggregate Score 30.35 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 86.50 | 52.8152.8 | 689 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #142 | 1.931.93Aggregate Score 77.23 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 53.6453.6 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #141 | 0.680.68Aggregate Score 81.52 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 53.7353.7 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #140 | 2.902.90Aggregate Score 35.53 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 81.39 | 53.8753.9 | 438 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #139 | 0.890.89Aggregate Score 71.43 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.93 | 54.8354.8 | 44 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #138 | 2.382.38Aggregate Score 39.38 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 78.10 | 54.8754.9 | 361 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #137 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 58.74 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.27 | 54.9554.9 | 96 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #136 | 0.970.97Aggregate Score 75.00 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 25.18 | 55.0755.1 | 37 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #135 | 2.712.71Aggregate Score 33.61 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 87.59 | 55.2055.2 | 704 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #134 | 1.281.28Aggregate Score 64.76 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 41.24 | 55.3555.4 | 69 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #133 | 2.272.27Aggregate Score 61.85 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 46.35 | 55.6555.6 | 86 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #132 | 2.532.53Aggregate Score 37.28 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 83.21 | 55.6655.7 | 524 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #131 | 0.920.92Aggregate Score 77.63 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 24.09 | 56.2156.2 | 36 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #130 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 51.89 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 63.14 | 56.3956.4 | 104 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #129 | 0.830.83Aggregate Score 75.76 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.74 | 56.5556.5 | 23 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #128 | 0.730.73Aggregate Score 90.29 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 6.20 | 56.6656.7 | 22 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #127 | 2.662.66Aggregate Score 35.15 | 0.53%Aggregate Score 89.42 | 56.8656.9 | 865 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #126 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 59.53 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.92 | 56.8956.9 | 111 teams2 / 15 encounters |
