Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #151 | 3.023.02Aggregate Score 28.13 | 0.40%Aggregate Score 85.04 | 50.8950.9 | 648 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #152 | 1.851.85Aggregate Score 63.46 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 31.75 | 50.7850.8 | 47 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #153 | 0.870.87Aggregate Score 78.26 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 50.7550.8 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #154 | 1.871.87Aggregate Score 51.91 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.81 | 50.2750.3 | 90 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #155 | 2.652.65Aggregate Score 32.29 | 0.20%Aggregate Score 76.64 | 50.0350.0 | 324 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #156 | 2.122.12Aggregate Score 60.21 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 34.31 | 49.8549.8 | 52 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #157 | 2.952.95Aggregate Score 28.94 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 79.93 | 49.3349.3 | 410 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #158 | 1.481.48Aggregate Score 69.23 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 19.34 | 49.2849.3 | 33 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #159 | 2.082.08Aggregate Score 51.38 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.89 | 48.7848.8 | 49 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #160 | 1.351.35Aggregate Score 79.61 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 48.6448.6 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #161 | 2.992.99Aggregate Score 18.42 | 0.80%Aggregate Score 92.70 | 48.1348.1 | 1,306 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #162 | 2.082.08Aggregate Score 45.36 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.19 | 48.0948.1 | 106 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #163 | 2.652.65Aggregate Score 29.01 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 76.28 | 47.9247.9 | 310 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #164 | 0.900.90Aggregate Score 67.35 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 47.7147.7 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #165 | 2.622.62Aggregate Score 46.45 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.27 | 47.5847.6 | 96 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #166 | 2.712.71Aggregate Score 40.13 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 58.03 | 47.2947.3 | 134 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #167 | 2.472.47Aggregate Score 51.28 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.51 | 46.9747.0 | 64 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #168 | 2.982.98Aggregate Score 20.01 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 86.86 | 46.7546.8 | 700 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #169 | 1.141.14Aggregate Score 75.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 46.7546.8 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #170 | 2.892.89Aggregate Score 37.85 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.49 | 46.5046.5 | 147 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #171 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 55.58 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 32.85 | 46.4946.5 | 48 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #172 | 2.432.43Aggregate Score 37.49 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.85 | 46.4446.4 | 87 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #173 | 1.101.10Aggregate Score 73.91 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 46.1046.1 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #174 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 70.30 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 45.9746.0 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #175 | 1.231.23Aggregate Score 72.37 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 6.20 | 45.9045.9 | 22 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #176 | 1.171.17Aggregate Score 69.70 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 9.49 | 45.6145.6 | 23 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #177 | 2.632.63Aggregate Score 35.75 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 58.76 | 44.9545.0 | 144 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #178 | 2.532.53Aggregate Score 54.46 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 30.29 | 44.7944.8 | 45 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #179 | 1.261.26Aggregate Score 60.61 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.80 | 44.6844.7 | 34 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #180 | 2.462.46Aggregate Score 59.41 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.26 | 44.5544.5 | 35 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #181 | 1.861.86Aggregate Score 59.22 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.26 | 44.4444.4 | 35 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #182 | 2.782.78Aggregate Score 25.13 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 72.99 | 44.2744.3 | 263 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #183 | 3.103.10Aggregate Score 30.06 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 65.33 | 44.1744.2 | 186 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #184 | 2.692.69Aggregate Score 18.93 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 81.75 | 44.0644.1 | 446 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #185 | 1.271.27Aggregate Score 61.22 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 44.0344.0 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #186 | 3.103.10Aggregate Score 28.75 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 66.06 | 43.6743.7 | 189 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #187 | 2.402.40Aggregate Score 35.00 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 55.84 | 43.3443.3 | 124 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #188 | 2.932.93Aggregate Score 38.11 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.00 | 42.8642.9 | 98 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #189 | 1.601.60Aggregate Score 69.57 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.19 | 42.6242.6 | 20 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #190 | 3.243.24Aggregate Score 17.75 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 79.20 | 42.3342.3 | 395 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #191 | 2.482.48Aggregate Score 45.85 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.77 | 41.8141.8 | 54 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #192 | 2.262.26Aggregate Score 55.43 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.80 | 41.5841.6 | 34 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #193 | 2.362.36Aggregate Score 32.79 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.01 | 41.2841.3 | 115 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #194 | 2.922.92Aggregate Score 30.06 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.93 | 40.8140.8 | 130 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #195 | 3.093.09Aggregate Score 19.50 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 72.26 | 40.6040.6 | 251 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #196 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 55.45 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 40.5740.6 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #197 | 3.763.76Aggregate Score 11.50 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 82.12 | 39.7539.7 | 474 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #198 | 2.352.35Aggregate Score 44.01 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 31.02 | 38.8138.8 | 46 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #199 | 3.003.00Aggregate Score 31.18 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.00 | 38.7138.7 | 98 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #200 | 2.592.59Aggregate Score 20.63 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 65.69 | 38.6538.7 | 187 teams3 / 15 encounters |
