Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #101 | 2.112.11Aggregate Score 63.71 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 57.30 | 61.1461.1 | 131 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #102 | 0.210.21Aggregate Score 94.74 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 10.58 | 61.0861.1 | 24 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #103 | 2.342.34Aggregate Score 39.10 | 0.91%Aggregate Score 93.80 | 60.9861.0 | 1,490 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #104 | 2.452.45Aggregate Score 39.98 | 0.77%Aggregate Score 92.34 | 60.9260.9 | 1,252 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #105 | 1.831.83Aggregate Score 69.23 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 48.18 | 60.8160.8 | 53 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #106 | 0.390.39Aggregate Score 89.47 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.42 | 60.2560.3 | 28 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #107 | 2.472.47Aggregate Score 62.64 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.20 | 60.0660.1 | 75 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #108 | 0.670.67Aggregate Score 74.53 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 38.32 | 60.0560.0 | 58 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #109 | 1.911.91Aggregate Score 76.15 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.40 | 59.8559.8 | 53 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #110 | 2.402.40Aggregate Score 41.09 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 87.59 | 59.6959.7 | 704 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #111 | 1.331.33Aggregate Score 62.23 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 55.11 | 59.3859.4 | 120 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #112 | 1.041.04Aggregate Score 89.11 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 59.3059.3 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #113 | 1.961.96Aggregate Score 52.41 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 69.34 | 59.1959.2 | 136 teams5 / 10 encounters | ||
| #114 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 59.66 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 58.39 | 59.1559.2 | 140 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #115 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 53.14 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 67.88 | 59.0459.0 | 215 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #116 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 55.19 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 63.87 | 58.6658.7 | 184 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #117 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 84.38 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.07 | 58.6558.7 | 20 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #118 | 2.092.09Aggregate Score 57.23 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 60.58 | 58.5758.6 | 149 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #119 | 2.422.42Aggregate Score 36.29 | 0.76%Aggregate Score 91.97 | 58.5658.6 | 1,238 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #120 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 41.34 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 82.48 | 57.8057.8 | 477 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #121 | 2.172.17Aggregate Score 37.32 | 0.49%Aggregate Score 88.32 | 57.7257.7 | 465 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #122 | 1.441.44Aggregate Score 64.92 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 46.72 | 57.6457.6 | 87 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #123 | 2.262.26Aggregate Score 52.65 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 64.60 | 57.4357.4 | 185 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #124 | 1.131.13Aggregate Score 67.31 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 41.97 | 57.1857.2 | 71 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #125 | 2.862.86Aggregate Score 36.44 | 0.48%Aggregate Score 87.96 | 57.0557.0 | 783 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #126 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 59.53 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.92 | 56.8956.9 | 111 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #127 | 2.662.66Aggregate Score 35.15 | 0.53%Aggregate Score 89.42 | 56.8656.9 | 865 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #128 | 0.730.73Aggregate Score 90.29 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 6.20 | 56.6656.7 | 22 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #129 | 0.830.83Aggregate Score 75.76 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.74 | 56.5556.5 | 23 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #130 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 51.89 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 63.14 | 56.3956.4 | 104 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #131 | 0.920.92Aggregate Score 77.63 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 24.09 | 56.2156.2 | 36 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #132 | 2.532.53Aggregate Score 37.28 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 83.21 | 55.6655.7 | 524 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #133 | 2.272.27Aggregate Score 61.85 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 46.35 | 55.6555.6 | 86 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #134 | 1.281.28Aggregate Score 64.76 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 41.24 | 55.3555.4 | 69 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #135 | 2.712.71Aggregate Score 33.61 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 87.59 | 55.2055.2 | 704 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #136 | 0.970.97Aggregate Score 75.00 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 25.18 | 55.0755.1 | 37 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #137 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 58.74 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.27 | 54.9554.9 | 96 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #138 | 2.382.38Aggregate Score 39.38 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 78.10 | 54.8754.9 | 361 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #139 | 0.890.89Aggregate Score 71.43 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.93 | 54.8354.8 | 44 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #140 | 2.902.90Aggregate Score 35.53 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 81.39 | 53.8753.9 | 438 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #141 | 0.680.68Aggregate Score 81.52 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 53.7353.7 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #142 | 1.931.93Aggregate Score 77.23 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.25 | 53.6453.6 | 30 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #143 | 3.093.09Aggregate Score 30.35 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 86.50 | 52.8152.8 | 689 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #144 | 0.930.93Aggregate Score 76.92 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.42 | 52.7252.7 | 28 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #145 | 1.431.43Aggregate Score 63.82 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.40 | 52.4552.5 | 53 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #146 | 2.912.91Aggregate Score 23.16 | 1.89%Aggregate Score 96.35 | 52.4452.4 | 3,076 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #147 | 2.642.64Aggregate Score 49.68 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 55.47 | 52.0052.0 | 72 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #148 | 0.760.76Aggregate Score 82.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 51.3751.4 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #148 | 0.760.76Aggregate Score 82.69 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 51.3751.4 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #150 | 2.792.79Aggregate Score 34.72 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 75.18 | 50.9150.9 | 291 teams5 / 15 encounters |
