Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #125 | 2.862.86Aggregate Score 36.44 | 0.48%Aggregate Score 87.96 | 57.0557.0 | 783 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #124 | 1.131.13Aggregate Score 67.31 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 41.97 | 57.1857.2 | 71 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #123 | 2.262.26Aggregate Score 52.65 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 64.60 | 57.4357.4 | 185 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #122 | 1.441.44Aggregate Score 64.92 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 46.72 | 57.6457.6 | 87 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #121 | 2.172.17Aggregate Score 37.32 | 0.49%Aggregate Score 88.32 | 57.7257.7 | 465 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #120 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 41.34 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 82.48 | 57.8057.8 | 477 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #119 | 2.422.42Aggregate Score 36.29 | 0.76%Aggregate Score 91.97 | 58.5658.6 | 1,238 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #118 | 2.092.09Aggregate Score 57.23 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 60.58 | 58.5758.6 | 149 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #117 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 84.38 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.07 | 58.6558.7 | 20 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #116 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 55.19 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 63.87 | 58.6658.7 | 184 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #115 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 53.14 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 67.88 | 59.0459.0 | 215 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #114 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 59.66 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 58.39 | 59.1559.2 | 140 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #113 | 1.961.96Aggregate Score 52.41 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 69.34 | 59.1959.2 | 136 teams5 / 10 encounters | ||
| #112 | 1.041.04Aggregate Score 89.11 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 59.3059.3 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #111 | 1.331.33Aggregate Score 62.23 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 55.11 | 59.3859.4 | 120 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #110 | 2.402.40Aggregate Score 41.09 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 87.59 | 59.6959.7 | 704 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #109 | 1.911.91Aggregate Score 76.15 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.40 | 59.8559.8 | 53 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #108 | 0.670.67Aggregate Score 74.53 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 38.32 | 60.0560.0 | 58 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #107 | 2.472.47Aggregate Score 62.64 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.20 | 60.0660.1 | 75 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #106 | 0.390.39Aggregate Score 89.47 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.42 | 60.2560.3 | 28 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #105 | 1.831.83Aggregate Score 69.23 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 48.18 | 60.8160.8 | 53 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #104 | 2.452.45Aggregate Score 39.98 | 0.77%Aggregate Score 92.34 | 60.9260.9 | 1,252 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #103 | 2.342.34Aggregate Score 39.10 | 0.91%Aggregate Score 93.80 | 60.9861.0 | 1,490 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #102 | 0.210.21Aggregate Score 94.74 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 10.58 | 61.0861.1 | 24 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #101 | 2.112.11Aggregate Score 63.71 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 57.30 | 61.1461.1 | 131 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #100 | 1.351.35Aggregate Score 66.93 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.28 | 61.4761.5 | 66 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #99 | 0.000.00Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 61.7561.8 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #98 | 1.431.43Aggregate Score 53.27 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 74.82 | 61.8961.9 | 289 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #97 | 2.332.33Aggregate Score 49.54 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 80.66 | 61.9962.0 | 418 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #96 | 0.200.20Aggregate Score 96.15 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 62.5162.5 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #95 | 1.981.98Aggregate Score 48.54 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 83.58 | 62.5562.6 | 530 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #94 | 1.891.89Aggregate Score 72.66 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.81 | 62.7262.7 | 90 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #93 | 0.440.44Aggregate Score 86.96 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 26.64 | 62.8362.8 | 39 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #92 | 2.642.64Aggregate Score 39.28 | 3.13%Aggregate Score 98.18 | 62.8462.8 | 5,096 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #91 | 2.042.04Aggregate Score 58.89 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.98 | 62.9262.9 | 226 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #90 | 2.302.30Aggregate Score 44.27 | 0.68%Aggregate Score 91.24 | 63.0663.1 | 1,106 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #89 | 0.520.52Aggregate Score 87.50 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.74 | 63.5963.6 | 23 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #88 | 2.222.22Aggregate Score 41.30 | 2.03%Aggregate Score 97.08 | 63.6163.6 | 3,312 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #87 | 0.850.85Aggregate Score 80.11 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 39.05 | 63.6963.7 | 59 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #86 | 0.260.26Aggregate Score 91.30 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.26 | 63.6963.7 | 35 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #85 | 1.861.86Aggregate Score 65.30 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 61.68 | 63.8563.9 | 97 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #84 | 1.831.83Aggregate Score 56.91 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 74.45 | 63.9263.9 | 281 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #83 | 0.130.13Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 10.58 | 64.2364.2 | 24 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #82 | 1.771.77Aggregate Score 77.62 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.16 | 64.2464.2 | 48 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #81 | 1.001.00Aggregate Score 82.51 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.86 | 64.2564.2 | 55 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #80 | 0.890.89Aggregate Score 80.76 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 39.78 | 64.3764.4 | 63 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #79 | 2.592.59Aggregate Score 41.80 | 3.18%Aggregate Score 98.54 | 64.5064.5 | 5,178 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #78 | 0.040.04Aggregate Score 97.83 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 64.5464.5 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #77 | 1.121.12Aggregate Score 78.08 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.53 | 64.6664.7 | 83 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #76 | 0.000.00Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 64.8264.8 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters |
