Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.113 encounters34,517 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #86 | 4.644.64Aggregate Score 9.09 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 11.76 | 10.1610.2 | 22 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #85 | 4.884.88Aggregate Score 8.04 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 30.59 | 17.0617.1 | 48 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #84 | 4.614.61Aggregate Score 15.15 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 20.00 | 17.0917.1 | 31 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #83 | 3.523.52Aggregate Score 18.18 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 21.18 | 19.3819.4 | 33 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #82 | 3.913.91Aggregate Score 25.00 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 11.76 | 19.7119.7 | 22 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #81 | 5.115.11Aggregate Score 0.00 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 50.59 | 20.2420.2 | 89 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #80 | 4.614.61Aggregate Score 18.18 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 24.71 | 20.7920.8 | 38 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #79 | 2.932.93Aggregate Score 22.22 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 28.24 | 24.6324.6 | 27 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #78 | 3.913.91Aggregate Score 33.33 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 11.76 | 24.7124.7 | 22 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #77 | 4.154.15Aggregate Score 39.39 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 25.0525.0 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #76 | 4.564.56Aggregate Score 5.85 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 54.12 | 25.1625.2 | 109 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #75 | 4.614.61Aggregate Score 8.02 | 0.31%Aggregate Score 51.76 | 25.5225.5 | 108 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #74 | 4.734.73Aggregate Score 14.67 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 45.88 | 27.1527.2 | 79 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #73 | 3.553.55Aggregate Score 45.00 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 28.4128.4 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #72 | 4.094.09Aggregate Score 22.83 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 40.00 | 29.7029.7 | 64 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #71 | 4.404.40Aggregate Score 30.30 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 30.59 | 30.4230.4 | 48 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #70 | 4.244.24Aggregate Score 36.36 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 24.71 | 31.7031.7 | 38 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #69 | 4.904.90Aggregate Score 31.09 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 34.12 | 32.3032.3 | 50 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #68 | 4.024.02Aggregate Score 29.44 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 41.18 | 34.1334.1 | 66 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #67 | 3.633.63Aggregate Score 35.00 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 35.29 | 35.1235.1 | 52 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #66 | 3.913.91Aggregate Score 51.52 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 11.76 | 35.6135.6 | 22 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #65 | 4.604.60Aggregate Score 5.58 | 1.49%Aggregate Score 85.88 | 37.7037.7 | 514 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #64 | 3.213.21Aggregate Score 46.43 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 25.88 | 38.2138.2 | 39 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #63 | 4.584.58Aggregate Score 23.28 | 0.51%Aggregate Score 62.35 | 38.9138.9 | 177 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #62 | 2.862.86Aggregate Score 60.71 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 7.06 | 39.2539.3 | 21 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #61 | 3.993.99Aggregate Score 30.09 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 54.12 | 39.7039.7 | 109 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #60 | 3.223.22Aggregate Score 38.81 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 43.53 | 40.7040.7 | 73 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #59 | 3.293.29Aggregate Score 50.00 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 27.06 | 40.8240.8 | 45 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #58 | 3.113.11Aggregate Score 60.00 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 15.29 | 42.1242.1 | 27 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #57 | 3.863.86Aggregate Score 47.17 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 38.82 | 43.8343.8 | 63 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #56 | 4.204.20Aggregate Score 26.31 | 0.71%Aggregate Score 71.76 | 44.4944.5 | 246 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #55 | 4.234.23Aggregate Score 23.19 | 1.19%Aggregate Score 82.35 | 46.8646.9 | 410 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #54 | 3.723.72Aggregate Score 34.33 | 0.59%Aggregate Score 65.88 | 46.9546.9 | 203 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #53 | 4.244.24Aggregate Score 27.71 | 0.98%Aggregate Score 78.82 | 48.1648.2 | 339 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #52 | 3.253.25Aggregate Score 60.00 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 31.76 | 48.7148.7 | 28 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #51 | 3.423.42Aggregate Score 72.73 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 14.12 | 49.2849.3 | 26 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #50 | 2.902.90Aggregate Score 50.07 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 48.24 | 49.3349.3 | 81 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #49 | 3.743.74Aggregate Score 32.17 | 1.03%Aggregate Score 80.00 | 51.3051.3 | 356 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #48 | 1.901.90Aggregate Score 83.33 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 51.4151.4 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #47 | 4.134.13Aggregate Score 37.31 | 0.88%Aggregate Score 76.47 | 52.9753.0 | 305 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #46 | 1.851.85Aggregate Score 86.67 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 53.4153.4 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #45 | 4.544.54Aggregate Score 81.25 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 12.94 | 53.9353.9 | 24 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #44 | 2.732.73Aggregate Score 58.10 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 49.41 | 54.6254.6 | 49 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #43 | 2.672.67Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 18.82 | 55.5355.5 | 30 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #42 | 3.103.10Aggregate Score 87.88 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 7.06 | 55.5555.6 | 21 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #41 | 3.823.82Aggregate Score 56.62 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 55.29 | 56.0956.1 | 111 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #40 | 4.144.14Aggregate Score 43.29 | 0.84%Aggregate Score 75.29 | 56.0956.1 | 168 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #39 | 2.622.62Aggregate Score 90.00 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 7.06 | 56.8256.8 | 21 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #38 | 3.833.83Aggregate Score 55.62 | 0.46%Aggregate Score 60.00 | 57.3757.4 | 159 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #37 | 3.633.63Aggregate Score 51.15 | 0.62%Aggregate Score 67.06 | 57.5157.5 | 123 teams3 / 9 encounters |
