Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.6.19 encounters137,006 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #191 | 7.317.31Aggregate Score 53.25 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 21.03 | 40.3640.4 | 29 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #190 | 6.966.96Aggregate Score 36.51 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 46.90 | 40.6640.7 | 23 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #189 | 6.406.40Aggregate Score 66.67 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 2.76 | 41.1041.1 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #188 | 7.217.21Aggregate Score 46.24 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 35.17 | 41.8141.8 | 47 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #187 | 6.256.25Aggregate Score 61.90 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 13.45 | 42.5242.5 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #186 | 5.695.69Aggregate Score 60.40 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 16.21 | 42.7242.7 | 26 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #185 | 8.808.80Aggregate Score 13.23 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 87.59 | 42.9743.0 | 591 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #184 | 8.178.17Aggregate Score 30.82 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 64.14 | 44.1544.1 | 162 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #183 | 6.836.83Aggregate Score 53.52 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 30.69 | 44.3944.4 | 42 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #182 | 9.109.10Aggregate Score 11.78 | 1.10%Aggregate Score 94.48 | 44.8644.9 | 1,503 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #181 | 6.816.81Aggregate Score 70.59 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 6.55 | 44.9745.0 | 21 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #180 | 6.536.53Aggregate Score 56.60 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.59 | 45.0045.0 | 34 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #179 | 7.567.56Aggregate Score 51.80 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 35.52 | 45.2845.3 | 48 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #178 | 6.916.91Aggregate Score 38.10 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.21 | 45.3445.3 | 32 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #177 | 8.008.00Aggregate Score 39.96 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.45 | 45.3645.4 | 97 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #176 | 8.648.64Aggregate Score 21.46 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 81.38 | 45.4345.4 | 370 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #175 | 6.536.53Aggregate Score 61.29 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.41 | 45.7445.7 | 30 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #174 | 8.418.41Aggregate Score 26.33 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 75.17 | 45.8745.9 | 258 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #173 | 8.348.34Aggregate Score 19.93 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 84.83 | 45.8945.9 | 436 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #172 | 8.248.24Aggregate Score 25.06 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 77.59 | 46.0746.1 | 289 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #171 | 6.176.17Aggregate Score 63.64 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 21.03 | 46.6046.6 | 29 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #170 | 8.758.75Aggregate Score 21.21 | 0.34%Aggregate Score 85.17 | 46.7946.8 | 469 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #169 | 8.028.02Aggregate Score 31.74 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 69.66 | 46.9046.9 | 194 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #168 | 7.987.98Aggregate Score 40.44 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 57.24 | 47.1647.2 | 115 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #167 | 8.628.62Aggregate Score 24.98 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 80.69 | 47.2747.3 | 354 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #166 | 8.118.11Aggregate Score 28.70 | 0.19%Aggregate Score 75.52 | 47.4347.4 | 259 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #165 | 8.458.45Aggregate Score 19.54 | 0.47%Aggregate Score 89.31 | 47.4547.5 | 649 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #164 | 7.327.32Aggregate Score 43.01 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.14 | 47.4647.5 | 99 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #163 | 7.887.88Aggregate Score 35.26 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 65.86 | 47.5047.5 | 173 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #162 | 6.406.40Aggregate Score 60.38 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 28.28 | 47.5447.5 | 35 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #161 | 8.218.21Aggregate Score 31.34 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 72.07 | 47.6347.6 | 210 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #160 | 6.916.91Aggregate Score 54.84 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 37.93 | 48.0848.1 | 54 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #159 | 5.255.25Aggregate Score 71.59 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 13.45 | 48.3348.3 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #158 | 7.927.92Aggregate Score 43.81 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 55.17 | 48.3548.4 | 105 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #157 | 5.675.67Aggregate Score 71.70 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 13.45 | 48.4048.4 | 24 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #156 | 7.687.68Aggregate Score 46.57 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.07 | 48.7748.8 | 91 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #155 | 8.228.22Aggregate Score 25.27 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 84.14 | 48.8248.8 | 406 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #154 | 7.177.17Aggregate Score 36.63 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 67.59 | 49.0149.0 | 54 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #153 | 8.608.60Aggregate Score 20.59 | 0.76%Aggregate Score 92.41 | 49.3249.3 | 1,036 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #152 | 6.506.50Aggregate Score 70.13 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 18.62 | 49.5349.5 | 28 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #151 | 6.806.80Aggregate Score 62.34 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 30.34 | 49.5449.5 | 40 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #150 | 6.156.15Aggregate Score 54.46 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 42.41 | 49.6449.6 | 20 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #149 | 7.077.07Aggregate Score 31.75 | 0.20%Aggregate Score 76.55 | 49.6749.7 | 81 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #148 | 7.947.94Aggregate Score 36.97 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.97 | 49.7749.8 | 193 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #147 | 7.977.97Aggregate Score 41.35 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 62.76 | 49.9249.9 | 154 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #146 | 7.977.97Aggregate Score 28.47 | 0.28%Aggregate Score 82.76 | 50.1950.2 | 384 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #145 | 6.116.11Aggregate Score 72.04 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 17.59 | 50.2650.3 | 27 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #144 | 6.226.22Aggregate Score 53.47 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 46.90 | 50.8450.8 | 23 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #143 | 4.834.83Aggregate Score 77.27 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 11.38 | 50.9250.9 | 23 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #142 | 4.904.90Aggregate Score 80.52 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 6.55 | 50.9350.9 | 21 teams1 / 9 encounters |
