Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #51 | 1.891.89Aggregate Score 61.74 | 0.34%Aggregate Score 84.31 | 70.7770.8 | 554 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #52 | 1.341.34Aggregate Score 71.77 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 66.79 | 69.7869.8 | 201 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #53 | 2.032.03Aggregate Score 65.98 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 74.09 | 69.2269.2 | 267 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #54 | 1.301.30Aggregate Score 69.46 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.61 | 69.1269.1 | 132 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #55 | 1.901.90Aggregate Score 52.64 | 0.85%Aggregate Score 93.43 | 68.9669.0 | 811 teams8 / 10 encounters | ||
| #56 | 1.511.51Aggregate Score 61.76 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 79.56 | 68.8868.9 | 233 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #57 | 1.711.71Aggregate Score 73.53 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 61.31 | 68.6468.6 | 90 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #58 | 1.701.70Aggregate Score 53.73 | 0.66%Aggregate Score 90.88 | 68.5968.6 | 630 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #59 | 1.191.19Aggregate Score 89.23 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.13 | 67.9968.0 | 32 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #60 | 2.112.11Aggregate Score 56.26 | 0.41%Aggregate Score 85.40 | 67.9267.9 | 664 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #61 | 2.162.16Aggregate Score 48.93 | 1.49%Aggregate Score 95.62 | 67.6167.6 | 2,427 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #62 | 0.490.49Aggregate Score 87.52 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.86 | 67.2567.3 | 55 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #63 | 0.270.27Aggregate Score 89.55 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 32.85 | 66.8766.9 | 48 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #64 | 0.750.75Aggregate Score 82.66 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 43.07 | 66.8266.8 | 75 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #65 | 1.581.58Aggregate Score 60.52 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 75.55 | 66.5366.5 | 173 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #66 | 0.150.15Aggregate Score 97.33 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.07 | 66.4366.4 | 20 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #67 | 2.452.45Aggregate Score 51.15 | 0.52%Aggregate Score 89.05 | 66.3166.3 | 496 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #68 | 1.501.50Aggregate Score 61.94 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 72.63 | 66.2166.2 | 151 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #69 | 0.650.65Aggregate Score 84.85 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.96 | 66.0966.1 | 57 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #70 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 68.02 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 62.77 | 65.9265.9 | 103 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #71 | 1.951.95Aggregate Score 64.47 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 67.52 | 65.6965.7 | 123 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #72 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 56.84 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 78.83 | 65.6365.6 | 381 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #73 | 0.440.44Aggregate Score 89.42 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.56 | 65.4865.5 | 43 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #74 | 0.190.19Aggregate Score 93.33 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.99 | 65.2065.2 | 21 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #75 | 0.610.61Aggregate Score 83.70 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.23 | 65.1165.1 | 56 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #76 | 0.000.00Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 64.8264.8 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #77 | 1.121.12Aggregate Score 78.08 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.53 | 64.6664.7 | 83 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #78 | 0.040.04Aggregate Score 97.83 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 14.60 | 64.5464.5 | 26 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #79 | 2.592.59Aggregate Score 41.80 | 3.18%Aggregate Score 98.54 | 64.5064.5 | 5,178 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #80 | 0.890.89Aggregate Score 80.76 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 39.78 | 64.3764.4 | 63 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #81 | 1.001.00Aggregate Score 82.51 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.86 | 64.2564.2 | 55 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #82 | 1.771.77Aggregate Score 77.62 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.16 | 64.2464.2 | 48 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #83 | 0.130.13Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 10.58 | 64.2364.2 | 24 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #84 | 1.831.83Aggregate Score 56.91 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 74.45 | 63.9263.9 | 281 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #85 | 1.861.86Aggregate Score 65.30 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 61.68 | 63.8563.9 | 97 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #86 | 0.260.26Aggregate Score 91.30 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.26 | 63.6963.7 | 35 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #87 | 0.850.85Aggregate Score 80.11 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 39.05 | 63.6963.7 | 59 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #88 | 2.222.22Aggregate Score 41.30 | 2.03%Aggregate Score 97.08 | 63.6163.6 | 3,312 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #89 | 0.520.52Aggregate Score 87.50 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 27.74 | 63.5963.6 | 23 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #90 | 2.302.30Aggregate Score 44.27 | 0.68%Aggregate Score 91.24 | 63.0663.1 | 1,106 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #91 | 2.042.04Aggregate Score 58.89 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.98 | 62.9262.9 | 226 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #92 | 2.642.64Aggregate Score 39.28 | 3.13%Aggregate Score 98.18 | 62.8462.8 | 5,096 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #93 | 0.440.44Aggregate Score 86.96 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 26.64 | 62.8362.8 | 39 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #94 | 1.891.89Aggregate Score 72.66 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 47.81 | 62.7262.7 | 90 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #95 | 1.981.98Aggregate Score 48.54 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 83.58 | 62.5562.6 | 530 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #96 | 0.200.20Aggregate Score 96.15 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 12.04 | 62.5162.5 | 25 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #97 | 2.332.33Aggregate Score 49.54 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 80.66 | 61.9962.0 | 418 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #98 | 1.431.43Aggregate Score 53.27 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 74.82 | 61.8961.9 | 289 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #99 | 0.000.00Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.01%Aggregate Score 4.38 | 61.7561.8 | 21 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #100 | 1.351.35Aggregate Score 66.93 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.28 | 61.4761.5 | 66 teams2 / 10 encounters |
