Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #75 | 0.610.61Aggregate Score 83.70 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.23 | 65.1165.1 | 56 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #74 | 0.190.19Aggregate Score 93.33 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 22.99 | 65.2065.2 | 21 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #73 | 0.440.44Aggregate Score 89.42 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 29.56 | 65.4865.5 | 43 teams1 / 15 encounters | ||
| #72 | 2.052.05Aggregate Score 56.84 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 78.83 | 65.6365.6 | 381 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #71 | 1.951.95Aggregate Score 64.47 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 67.52 | 65.6965.7 | 123 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #70 | 2.132.13Aggregate Score 68.02 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 62.77 | 65.9265.9 | 103 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #69 | 0.650.65Aggregate Score 84.85 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.96 | 66.0966.1 | 57 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #68 | 1.501.50Aggregate Score 61.94 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 72.63 | 66.2166.2 | 151 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #67 | 2.452.45Aggregate Score 51.15 | 0.52%Aggregate Score 89.05 | 66.3166.3 | 496 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #66 | 0.150.15Aggregate Score 97.33 | 0.02%Aggregate Score 20.07 | 66.4366.4 | 20 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #65 | 1.581.58Aggregate Score 60.52 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 75.55 | 66.5366.5 | 173 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #64 | 0.750.75Aggregate Score 82.66 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 43.07 | 66.8266.8 | 75 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #63 | 0.270.27Aggregate Score 89.55 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 32.85 | 66.8766.9 | 48 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #62 | 0.490.49Aggregate Score 87.52 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.86 | 67.2567.3 | 55 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #61 | 2.162.16Aggregate Score 48.93 | 1.49%Aggregate Score 95.62 | 67.6167.6 | 2,427 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #60 | 2.112.11Aggregate Score 56.26 | 0.41%Aggregate Score 85.40 | 67.9267.9 | 664 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #59 | 1.191.19Aggregate Score 89.23 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 36.13 | 67.9968.0 | 32 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #58 | 1.701.70Aggregate Score 53.73 | 0.66%Aggregate Score 90.88 | 68.5968.6 | 630 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #57 | 1.711.71Aggregate Score 73.53 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 61.31 | 68.6468.6 | 90 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #56 | 1.511.51Aggregate Score 61.76 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 79.56 | 68.8868.9 | 233 teams4 / 10 encounters | ||
| #55 | 1.901.90Aggregate Score 52.64 | 0.85%Aggregate Score 93.43 | 68.9669.0 | 811 teams8 / 10 encounters | ||
| #54 | 1.301.30Aggregate Score 69.46 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.61 | 69.1269.1 | 132 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #53 | 2.032.03Aggregate Score 65.98 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 74.09 | 69.2269.2 | 267 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #52 | 1.341.34Aggregate Score 71.77 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 66.79 | 69.7869.8 | 201 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #51 | 1.891.89Aggregate Score 61.74 | 0.34%Aggregate Score 84.31 | 70.7770.8 | 554 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #50 | 1.601.60Aggregate Score 71.48 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 70.80 | 71.2171.2 | 144 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #49 | 1.931.93Aggregate Score 90.63 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 42.70 | 71.4671.5 | 43 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #48 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 71.81 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 71.53 | 71.7071.7 | 246 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #47 | 0.830.83Aggregate Score 96.88 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 33.94 | 71.7071.7 | 30 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #46 | 0.140.14Aggregate Score 95.02 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.96 | 72.2072.2 | 57 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #45 | 1.781.78Aggregate Score 63.10 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 86.50 | 72.4672.5 | 689 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #44 | 2.172.17Aggregate Score 58.62 | 1.45%Aggregate Score 95.26 | 73.2773.3 | 2,366 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #43 | 0.710.71Aggregate Score 87.57 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.65 | 74.0074.0 | 114 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #42 | 0.470.47Aggregate Score 89.01 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.74 | 75.3075.3 | 118 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #41 | 1.971.97Aggregate Score 62.60 | 0.97%Aggregate Score 94.53 | 75.3775.4 | 1,574 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #40 | 1.631.63Aggregate Score 68.63 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 85.77 | 75.4975.5 | 398 teams5 / 10 encounters | ||
| #39 | 0.100.10Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.88 | 76.3576.4 | 40 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #38 | 1.841.84Aggregate Score 62.09 | 3.11%Aggregate Score 97.81 | 76.3876.4 | 5,071 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #37 | 1.631.63Aggregate Score 76.33 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 77.74 | 76.8976.9 | 360 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #36 | 0.500.50Aggregate Score 87.77 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 60.58 | 76.9076.9 | 149 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #35 | 0.010.01Aggregate Score 99.26 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 45.26 | 77.6677.7 | 84 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #34 | 0.330.33Aggregate Score 90.34 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.12 | 77.8577.9 | 145 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #33 | 1.081.08Aggregate Score 67.14 | 0.95%Aggregate Score 94.16 | 77.9577.9 | 1,540 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #32 | 0.050.05Aggregate Score 96.53 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.36 | 78.0678.1 | 99 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #31 | 0.780.78Aggregate Score 86.66 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 65.33 | 78.1378.1 | 186 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #30 | 1.311.31Aggregate Score 74.57 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 83.94 | 78.3278.3 | 542 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #29 | 1.311.31Aggregate Score 71.07 | 0.64%Aggregate Score 90.51 | 78.8578.8 | 1,048 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #28 | 0.310.31Aggregate Score 92.74 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 58.03 | 78.8678.9 | 134 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #27 | 0.940.94Aggregate Score 77.70 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 81.02 | 79.0379.0 | 431 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #26 | 0.160.16Aggregate Score 97.57 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 51.82 | 79.2779.3 | 105 teams3 / 15 encounters |
