Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.6.19 encounters137,006 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 4.154.15Aggregate Score 89.29 | 0.52%Aggregate Score 90.69 | 89.8589.9 | 208 teams2 / 3 encounters | ||
| #2 | 3.993.99Aggregate Score 85.81 | 1.21%Aggregate Score 95.17 | 89.5589.6 | 1,654 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #3 | 3.193.19Aggregate Score 91.36 | 0.35%Aggregate Score 85.52 | 89.0289.0 | 485 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #4 | 4.974.97Aggregate Score 82.88 | 1.33%Aggregate Score 95.52 | 87.9487.9 | 536 teams2 / 3 encounters | ||
| #5 | 4.404.40Aggregate Score 81.37 | 2.33%Aggregate Score 97.59 | 87.8687.9 | 3,189 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #6 | 3.073.07Aggregate Score 92.21 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 76.90 | 86.0986.1 | 286 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #7 | 3.863.86Aggregate Score 88.37 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 81.38 | 85.5785.6 | 370 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #8 | 2.642.64Aggregate Score 95.95 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.62 | 85.0285.0 | 190 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #9 | 1.021.02Aggregate Score 99.01 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 63.79 | 84.9284.9 | 47 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #10 | 5.065.06Aggregate Score 78.81 | 0.73%Aggregate Score 92.07 | 84.1284.1 | 995 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #11 | 2.062.06Aggregate Score 95.73 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 65.52 | 83.6583.6 | 171 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #12 | 5.255.25Aggregate Score 78.50 | 0.57%Aggregate Score 91.03 | 83.5183.5 | 782 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #13 | 5.095.09Aggregate Score 77.99 | 0.64%Aggregate Score 91.38 | 83.3483.3 | 872 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #14 | 5.305.30Aggregate Score 74.03 | 2.32%Aggregate Score 97.24 | 83.3183.3 | 3,175 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #15 | 2.742.74Aggregate Score 89.11 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 73.45 | 82.8482.8 | 66 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #16 | 1.201.20Aggregate Score 99.17 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.90 | 82.2682.3 | 114 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #17 | 2.572.57Aggregate Score 94.58 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 62.41 | 81.7181.7 | 151 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #18 | 4.064.06Aggregate Score 82.84 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 78.97 | 81.2981.3 | 305 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #19 | 1.861.86Aggregate Score 97.45 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 56.90 | 81.2381.2 | 114 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #20 | 6.546.54Aggregate Score 68.60 | 8.57%Aggregate Score 99.66 | 81.0281.0 | 11,739 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #21 | 1.791.79Aggregate Score 98.18 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.45 | 80.2980.3 | 97 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #22 | 2.362.36Aggregate Score 92.66 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 59.31 | 79.3279.3 | 132 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #23 | 4.184.18Aggregate Score 80.20 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 77.93 | 79.2979.3 | 85 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #24 | 3.893.89Aggregate Score 84.91 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 70.69 | 79.2279.2 | 203 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #25 | 5.795.79Aggregate Score 71.98 | 0.45%Aggregate Score 88.62 | 78.6478.6 | 616 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #26 | 4.104.10Aggregate Score 87.82 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 64.83 | 78.6378.6 | 166 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #27 | 5.995.99Aggregate Score 66.66 | 1.17%Aggregate Score 94.83 | 77.9377.9 | 470 teams2 / 3 encounters | ||
| #28 | 6.076.07Aggregate Score 70.54 | 0.47%Aggregate Score 88.97 | 77.9177.9 | 640 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #29 | 3.223.22Aggregate Score 98.41 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 46.90 | 77.8177.8 | 23 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #30 | 6.456.45Aggregate Score 62.93 | 12.89%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 77.7677.8 | 17,654 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #31 | 2.562.56Aggregate Score 94.28 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.76 | 77.6777.7 | 96 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #32 | 2.742.74Aggregate Score 93.13 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.79 | 77.4077.4 | 98 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #33 | 6.736.73Aggregate Score 62.79 | 2.76%Aggregate Score 98.62 | 77.1277.1 | 3,781 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #34 | 6.076.07Aggregate Score 63.21 | 2.08%Aggregate Score 96.55 | 76.5576.5 | 836 teams3 / 3 encounters | ||
| #35 | 6.516.51Aggregate Score 68.82 | 0.45%Aggregate Score 87.93 | 76.4676.5 | 611 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #36 | 3.433.43Aggregate Score 94.81 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 48.62 | 76.3376.3 | 82 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #37 | 2.852.85Aggregate Score 93.72 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.00 | 76.2376.2 | 84 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #38 | 3.033.03Aggregate Score 86.14 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 58.62 | 75.1375.1 | 37 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #39 | 5.245.24Aggregate Score 80.95 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 65.17 | 74.6474.6 | 49 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #40 | 6.536.53Aggregate Score 62.54 | 0.78%Aggregate Score 92.76 | 74.6274.6 | 1,066 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #41 | 4.214.21Aggregate Score 83.55 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 60.69 | 74.4074.4 | 139 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #42 | 5.495.49Aggregate Score 67.33 | 0.31%Aggregate Score 84.48 | 74.1974.2 | 125 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #43 | 6.216.21Aggregate Score 65.45 | 0.40%Aggregate Score 86.90 | 74.0374.0 | 542 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #44 | 5.755.75Aggregate Score 67.55 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 83.45 | 73.9173.9 | 392 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #45 | 2.702.70Aggregate Score 93.50 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 44.14 | 73.7573.8 | 71 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #46 | 6.796.79Aggregate Score 56.37 | 4.25%Aggregate Score 99.31 | 73.5573.5 | 5,820 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #47 | 3.533.53Aggregate Score 89.19 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 49.66 | 73.3873.4 | 83 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #48 | 3.733.73Aggregate Score 85.62 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.48 | 73.1673.2 | 100 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #49 | 1.001.00Aggregate Score 99.15 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 33.10 | 72.7372.7 | 44 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #50 | 5.515.51Aggregate Score 65.35 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 83.79 | 72.7372.7 | 116 teams1 / 3 encounters |
