Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.115 encounters162,894 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0.710.71Aggregate Score 85.68 | 1.65%Aggregate Score 95.99 | 89.8089.8 | 2,689 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #2 | 0.590.59Aggregate Score 93.07 | 0.36%Aggregate Score 84.67 | 89.7189.7 | 589 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #3 | 0.580.58Aggregate Score 87.37 | 0.84%Aggregate Score 93.07 | 89.6589.6 | 1,366 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #4 | 0.810.81Aggregate Score 78.68 | 3.77%Aggregate Score 99.27 | 86.9286.9 | 6,137 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #5 | 0.070.07Aggregate Score 99.16 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 68.25 | 86.7986.8 | 221 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #6 | 0.650.65Aggregate Score 81.35 | 1.09%Aggregate Score 94.89 | 86.7686.8 | 1,772 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #7 | 0.420.42Aggregate Score 94.86 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 71.90 | 85.6885.7 | 147 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #8 | 1.571.57Aggregate Score 77.82 | 2.02%Aggregate Score 96.72 | 85.3885.4 | 1,935 teams6 / 10 encounters | ||
| #9 | 0.340.34Aggregate Score 91.95 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 73.72 | 84.6684.7 | 156 teams3 / 10 encounters | ||
| #10 | 1.611.61Aggregate Score 79.45 | 0.69%Aggregate Score 91.61 | 84.3184.3 | 1,130 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #11 | 1.161.16Aggregate Score 79.78 | 0.60%Aggregate Score 89.78 | 83.7883.8 | 575 teams8 / 10 encounters | ||
| #12 | 0.140.14Aggregate Score 97.60 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 62.41 | 83.5283.5 | 174 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #13 | 1.781.78Aggregate Score 70.91 | 12.94%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 82.5582.5 | 21,074 teams15 / 15 encounters | ||
| #14 | 1.091.09Aggregate Score 77.36 | 0.64%Aggregate Score 90.15 | 82.4782.5 | 1,039 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #15 | 1.761.76Aggregate Score 70.39 | 3.32%Aggregate Score 98.91 | 81.8081.8 | 3,186 teams5 / 10 encounters | ||
| #16 | 0.750.75Aggregate Score 82.55 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 80.29 | 81.6581.6 | 416 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #17 | 0.990.99Aggregate Score 76.60 | 0.50%Aggregate Score 88.69 | 81.4381.4 | 822 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #18 | 1.491.49Aggregate Score 68.82 | 8.20%Aggregate Score 99.64 | 81.1581.1 | 13,353 teams12 / 15 encounters | ||
| #19 | 0.370.37Aggregate Score 90.63 | 0.12%Aggregate Score 66.42 | 80.9480.9 | 199 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #20 | 0.650.65Aggregate Score 85.42 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 73.36 | 80.6080.6 | 264 teams7 / 15 encounters | ||
| #21 | 1.511.51Aggregate Score 68.35 | 2.78%Aggregate Score 97.45 | 79.9980.0 | 4,534 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #22 | 0.200.20Aggregate Score 96.55 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.38 | 79.6879.7 | 69 teams2 / 10 encounters | ||
| #23 | 1.261.26Aggregate Score 77.45 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 82.85 | 79.6179.6 | 491 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #24 | 0.780.78Aggregate Score 86.05 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 69.71 | 79.5279.5 | 236 teams6 / 15 encounters | ||
| #25 | 0.040.04Aggregate Score 97.45 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 52.55 | 79.4979.5 | 110 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #26 | 0.160.16Aggregate Score 97.57 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 51.82 | 79.2779.3 | 105 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #27 | 0.940.94Aggregate Score 77.70 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 81.02 | 79.0379.0 | 431 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #28 | 0.310.31Aggregate Score 92.74 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 58.03 | 78.8678.9 | 134 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #29 | 1.311.31Aggregate Score 71.07 | 0.64%Aggregate Score 90.51 | 78.8578.8 | 1,048 teams8 / 15 encounters | ||
| #30 | 1.311.31Aggregate Score 74.57 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 83.94 | 78.3278.3 | 542 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #31 | 0.780.78Aggregate Score 86.66 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 65.33 | 78.1378.1 | 186 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #32 | 0.050.05Aggregate Score 96.53 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 50.36 | 78.0678.1 | 99 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #33 | 1.081.08Aggregate Score 67.14 | 0.95%Aggregate Score 94.16 | 77.9577.9 | 1,540 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #34 | 0.330.33Aggregate Score 90.34 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 59.12 | 77.8577.9 | 145 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #35 | 0.010.01Aggregate Score 99.26 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 45.26 | 77.6677.7 | 84 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #36 | 0.500.50Aggregate Score 87.77 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 60.58 | 76.9076.9 | 149 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #37 | 1.631.63Aggregate Score 76.33 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 77.74 | 76.8976.9 | 360 teams5 / 15 encounters | ||
| #38 | 1.841.84Aggregate Score 62.09 | 3.11%Aggregate Score 97.81 | 76.3876.4 | 5,071 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #39 | 0.100.10Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 40.88 | 76.3576.4 | 40 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #40 | 1.631.63Aggregate Score 68.63 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 85.77 | 75.4975.5 | 398 teams5 / 10 encounters | ||
| #41 | 1.971.97Aggregate Score 62.60 | 0.97%Aggregate Score 94.53 | 75.3775.4 | 1,574 teams11 / 15 encounters | ||
| #42 | 0.470.47Aggregate Score 89.01 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 54.74 | 75.3075.3 | 118 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #43 | 0.710.71Aggregate Score 87.57 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 53.65 | 74.0074.0 | 114 teams4 / 15 encounters | ||
| #44 | 2.172.17Aggregate Score 58.62 | 1.45%Aggregate Score 95.26 | 73.2773.3 | 2,366 teams9 / 15 encounters | ||
| #45 | 1.781.78Aggregate Score 63.10 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 86.50 | 72.4672.5 | 689 teams10 / 15 encounters | ||
| #46 | 0.140.14Aggregate Score 95.02 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 37.96 | 72.2072.2 | 57 teams2 / 15 encounters | ||
| #47 | 0.830.83Aggregate Score 96.88 | 0.03%Aggregate Score 33.94 | 71.7071.7 | 30 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #48 | 1.741.74Aggregate Score 71.81 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 71.53 | 71.7071.7 | 246 teams3 / 15 encounters | ||
| #49 | 1.931.93Aggregate Score 90.63 | 0.04%Aggregate Score 42.70 | 71.4671.5 | 43 teams1 / 10 encounters | ||
| #50 | 1.601.60Aggregate Score 71.48 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 70.80 | 71.2171.2 | 144 teams2 / 10 encounters |
