Team Rankings
Compare three-Agent teams within Shiyu Defense or Deadly Assault. Team Index balances observed usage with encounter-relative performance in the selected mode.
Which teams combine frequent play with strong endgame results?
Team Index balances usage and performance, with separate rankings for Shiyu Defense and Deadly Assault. The same three Agents form one composition regardless of their order.
- Which teams qualify:
Shiyu includes complete S-rated teams. Deadly Assault includes complete Normal teams with three stars. Integrated is separate and excluded here. A composition needs at least 20 recorded teams and a score for every result in an encounter to qualify there. Without a qualifying encounter, it remains unranked.
- Avg. Performance:
The average reported score across all accepted results for a published composition. Every team result has equal weight, so encounters with more results contribute more.
- Team Index:
40% Usage Rate Aggregate Score and 60% performance. Performance is compared within each encounter first, then weighted by the number of qualifying teams. Equal values share a rank; sorting the table does not change that rank.
- Usage Rate and Coverage:
Usage Rate divides all of a composition’s selected observations by all included teams in the mode. Its Aggregate Score expresses that rate as a percentile among eligible compositions. Coverage shows pooled observation and Index-qualified encounter counts—not unique players or ownership. Counts, scores and qualification use the selected ALL or M0 population. Results are not adjusted for release date.
- ALL / M0:
ALL includes every admitted team observation. M0 requires all three Agents to have known Mindscapes and every Limited S Agent in that team to be M0. Standard S, Free S and A-rank Agents may have higher Mindscapes. This describes the recorded team, not the whole account. Unknown Mindscapes do not qualify for M0.
- Mindscapes:
The distribution uses all known Mindscape levels for that exact team in encounters where it meets the selected population’s publication threshold. Selecting M0 does not restrict ownership to M0 observations. Unknown levels are excluded from each Agent’s denominator, not treated as M0. It does not measure account-wide ownership.
- Limits:
The latest three verified cycles are pooled, or fewer when unavailable. Each cycle’s encounters remain separate for qualification and performance comparison. Community results do not represent every player, and builds, investment and matchups affect scores. Separate build and outlier filters from the source are not applied here. Missing encounters are not estimated, and combined totals are never added again to the individual battles they contain.
Data & sources
Community observations come from LvlUrArti’s ShiyuData dataset. AstraVoy independently calculates the displayed statistics and rankings and creates their visualizations.
View LvlUrArti / ShiyuData| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 37,507.54 | 7.85%Aggregate Score 98.33 | 97.6597.7 | 5,417 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #2 | 37,620.14 | 3.24%Aggregate Score 92.50 | 94.9594.9 | 2,238 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #3 | 34,823.37 | 5.86%Aggregate Score 97.50 | 93.8793.9 | 4,041 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #4 | 34,093.97 | 3.78%Aggregate Score 95.00 | 91.1891.2 | 2,607 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #5 | 34,320.82 | 10.65%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 91.0891.1 | 7,343 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #6 | 36,477.20 | 1.74%Aggregate Score 89.17 | 91.0891.1 | 1,199 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #7 | 34,878.29 | 3.38%Aggregate Score 93.33 | 90.4690.5 | 2,330 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #8 | 35,659.98 | 0.50%Aggregate Score 78.33 | 90.2290.2 | 342 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #9 | 34,738.80 | 1.55%Aggregate Score 87.50 | 89.8589.9 | 1,067 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #10 | 34,672.93 | 4.59%Aggregate Score 95.83 | 84.6884.7 | 3,164 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #11 | 34,525.97 | 0.66%Aggregate Score 80.83 | 83.9183.9 | 453 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #12 | 32,899.10 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 75.83 | 83.1483.1 | 299 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #13 | 33,462.19 | 2.22%Aggregate Score 90.83 | 81.1781.2 | 1,532 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #14 | 31,085.47 | 10.09%Aggregate Score 99.17 | 80.4980.5 | 6,961 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #15 | 34,877.89 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 55.83 | 79.4579.4 | 146 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #16 | 33,138.81 | 0.69%Aggregate Score 81.67 | 78.5678.6 | 473 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #17 | 33,144.75 | 1.30%Aggregate Score 85.83 | 77.5077.5 | 895 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #18 | 34,809.77 | 0.41%Aggregate Score 75.00 | 76.5576.6 | 285 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #19 | 31,972.62 | 0.35%Aggregate Score 72.50 | 76.4476.4 | 240 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #20 | 32,186.43 | 1.40%Aggregate Score 86.67 | 76.3776.4 | 966 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #21 | 33,440.37 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 70.00 | 73.9173.9 | 226 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #22 | 31,384.63 | 5.18%Aggregate Score 96.67 | 73.8773.9 | 3,572 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #23 | 32,507.34 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 57.50 | 73.2373.2 | 152 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #24 | 31,582.23 | 3.63%Aggregate Score 94.17 | 72.6572.6 | 2,506 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #25 | 32,288.98 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 52.50 | 72.6372.6 | 124 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #26 | 29,728.17 | 3.21%Aggregate Score 91.67 | 71.7071.7 | 2,215 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #27 | 31,757.20 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 70.83 | 71.3671.4 | 230 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #28 | 29,710.39 | 0.73%Aggregate Score 83.33 | 70.1570.2 | 505 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #29 | 32,329.16 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 60.00 | 69.6169.6 | 159 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #30 | 31,707.75 | 0.37%Aggregate Score 74.17 | 69.2569.2 | 257 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #31 | 31,493.73 | 0.80%Aggregate Score 84.17 | 69.1869.2 | 551 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #32 | 30,573.13 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 65.00 | 66.4766.5 | 180 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #33 | 31,556.79 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 59.17 | 65.3565.4 | 156 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #34 | 33,858.91 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 24.17 | 65.1765.2 | 53 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #35 | 29,736.98 | 0.35%Aggregate Score 72.50 | 64.7964.8 | 240 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #36 | 30,247.44 | 0.53%Aggregate Score 79.17 | 63.6263.6 | 369 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #37 | 31,770.49 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 25.83 | 62.0662.1 | 55 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #38 | 29,836.68 | 0.31%Aggregate Score 67.50 | 60.6660.7 | 213 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #39 | 30,930.89 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 65.00 | 60.6160.6 | 180 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #40 | 29,496.04 | 2.18%Aggregate Score 90.00 | 60.6060.6 | 1,507 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #41 | 31,567.23 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 62.50 | 60.3460.3 | 176 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #42 | 32,593.02 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 15.00 | 60.0060.0 | 42 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #43 | 32,556.60 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 17.50 | 59.5059.5 | 45 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #44 | 29,633.38 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 65.83 | 59.4459.4 | 197 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #45 | 32,434.19 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 51.67 | 58.9859.0 | 123 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #46 | 32,756.91 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 45.83 | 58.8058.8 | 97 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #47 | 30,296.73 | 0.45%Aggregate Score 76.67 | 58.6058.6 | 309 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #48 | 31,358.45 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 46.67 | 56.1856.2 | 99 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #49 | 29,108.49 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 60.83 | 54.3354.3 | 167 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #50 | 31,169.73 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 50.83 | 54.2754.3 | 120 teams2 / 9 encounters |
