Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.6.19 encounters30,874 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 7.487.48Aggregate Score 99.28 | 3.51%Aggregate Score 96.04 | 97.9898.0 | 1,083 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #2 | 7.587.58Aggregate Score 100.00 | 1.10%Aggregate Score 85.15 | 94.0694.1 | 100 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #3 | 7.857.85Aggregate Score 94.44 | 1.76%Aggregate Score 88.12 | 91.9191.9 | 161 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #4 | 8.128.12Aggregate Score 88.89 | 3.14%Aggregate Score 93.07 | 90.5690.6 | 287 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #5 | 9.219.21Aggregate Score 81.53 | 9.41%Aggregate Score 99.01 | 88.5288.5 | 2,905 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #6 | 8.168.16Aggregate Score 84.00 | 2.04%Aggregate Score 90.10 | 86.4486.4 | 186 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #7 | 7.257.25Aggregate Score 95.74 | 0.50%Aggregate Score 70.30 | 85.5685.6 | 154 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #8 | 7.507.50Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.35%Aggregate Score 63.37 | 85.3585.3 | 32 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #9 | 5.305.30Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.33%Aggregate Score 62.38 | 84.9585.0 | 103 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #10 | 9.339.33Aggregate Score 76.96 | 3.41%Aggregate Score 95.05 | 84.2084.2 | 1,053 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #11 | 9.229.22Aggregate Score 86.68 | 0.74%Aggregate Score 78.22 | 83.2983.3 | 230 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #12 | 8.638.63Aggregate Score 75.58 | 3.10%Aggregate Score 92.08 | 82.1882.2 | 957 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #13 | 9.039.03Aggregate Score 68.73 | 19.55%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 81.2481.2 | 6,036 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #14 | 8.038.03Aggregate Score 92.00 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 61.39 | 79.7579.8 | 29 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #15 | 8.208.20Aggregate Score 78.57 | 0.80%Aggregate Score 80.20 | 79.2279.2 | 247 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #16 | 8.228.22Aggregate Score 81.01 | 0.55%Aggregate Score 74.26 | 78.3178.3 | 170 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #17 | 8.538.53Aggregate Score 68.00 | 2.22%Aggregate Score 91.09 | 77.2477.2 | 203 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #18 | 9.359.35Aggregate Score 63.11 | 4.19%Aggregate Score 98.02 | 77.0777.1 | 1,295 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #19 | 8.008.00Aggregate Score 80.75 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 66.34 | 74.9875.0 | 131 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #20 | 8.308.30Aggregate Score 90.76 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 50.50 | 74.6574.7 | 81 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #21 | 8.738.73Aggregate Score 94.53 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 42.57 | 73.7573.8 | 70 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #22 | 9.049.04Aggregate Score 67.35 | 1.03%Aggregate Score 82.18 | 73.2873.3 | 317 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #23 | 8.668.66Aggregate Score 74.83 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 67.33 | 71.8371.8 | 132 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #24 | 6.496.49Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 25.74 | 70.3070.3 | 35 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #25 | 8.468.46Aggregate Score 72.00 | 0.41%Aggregate Score 65.35 | 69.3469.3 | 37 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #26 | 10.1110.11Aggregate Score 52.70 | 3.19%Aggregate Score 94.06 | 69.2469.2 | 984 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #27 | 10.0210.02Aggregate Score 50.53 | 3.75%Aggregate Score 97.03 | 69.1369.1 | 1,158 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #28 | 8.218.21Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.26%Aggregate Score 51.49 | 68.5968.6 | 24 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #29 | 9.849.84Aggregate Score 53.93 | 1.88%Aggregate Score 89.11 | 68.0068.0 | 581 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #30 | 9.659.65Aggregate Score 61.18 | 0.68%Aggregate Score 77.23 | 67.6067.6 | 211 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #31 | 9.899.89Aggregate Score 55.81 | 1.09%Aggregate Score 84.16 | 67.1567.2 | 338 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #32 | 8.618.61Aggregate Score 85.71 | 0.18%Aggregate Score 37.62 | 66.4866.5 | 56 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #33 | 8.238.23Aggregate Score 74.74 | 0.27%Aggregate Score 53.47 | 66.2366.2 | 82 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #34 | 7.827.82Aggregate Score 94.12 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 21.78 | 65.1865.2 | 28 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #35 | 8.998.99Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 41.58 | 64.6364.6 | 69 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #36 | 9.589.58Aggregate Score 74.78 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 48.51 | 64.2764.3 | 77 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #37 | 10.1510.15Aggregate Score 55.14 | 0.62%Aggregate Score 75.25 | 63.1863.2 | 192 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #38 | 9.639.63Aggregate Score 61.01 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 60.40 | 60.7760.8 | 98 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #39 | 9.249.24Aggregate Score 59.76 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 60.40 | 60.0260.0 | 98 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #40 | 8.708.70Aggregate Score 66.67 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 49.50 | 59.8059.8 | 23 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #41 | 8.788.78Aggregate Score 61.11 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 57.43 | 59.6459.6 | 27 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #42 | 6.756.75Aggregate Score 95.65 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 1.98 | 58.1858.2 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #43 | 8.318.31Aggregate Score 71.43 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 36.63 | 57.5157.5 | 51 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #44 | 10.0010.00Aggregate Score 73.91 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 31.68 | 57.0257.0 | 39 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #45 | 9.489.48Aggregate Score 64.71 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 44.55 | 56.6556.6 | 71 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #46 | 8.348.34Aggregate Score 70.58 | 0.16%Aggregate Score 35.64 | 56.6056.6 | 50 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #47 | 10.0710.07Aggregate Score 36.85 | 1.32%Aggregate Score 86.14 | 56.5656.6 | 406 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #48 | 10.2710.27Aggregate Score 40.87 | 0.77%Aggregate Score 79.21 | 56.2156.2 | 239 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #49 | 9.889.88Aggregate Score 42.41 | 0.68%Aggregate Score 76.24 | 55.9455.9 | 209 teams7 / 9 encounters | ||
| #50 | 9.769.76Aggregate Score 37.49 | 0.81%Aggregate Score 81.19 | 54.9755.0 | 251 teams3 / 9 encounters |
