Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.4.1 → 4.6.113 encounters34,517 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 1.981.98Aggregate Score 92.87 | 5.56%Aggregate Score 95.29 | 93.8493.8 | 1,918 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #2 | 2.802.80Aggregate Score 87.27 | 7.66%Aggregate Score 98.82 | 91.8991.9 | 2,643 teams7 / 13 encounters | ||
| #3 | 2.892.89Aggregate Score 83.28 | 5.89%Aggregate Score 97.65 | 89.0389.0 | 1,175 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #4 | 3.263.26Aggregate Score 91.94 | 1.22%Aggregate Score 83.53 | 88.5888.6 | 422 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #5 | 3.253.25Aggregate Score 78.50 | 5.79%Aggregate Score 96.47 | 85.6985.7 | 1,998 teams7 / 13 encounters | ||
| #6 | 3.233.23Aggregate Score 82.24 | 2.24%Aggregate Score 89.41 | 85.1185.1 | 448 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #7 | 1.341.34Aggregate Score 98.41 | 0.50%Aggregate Score 61.18 | 83.5283.5 | 172 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #8 | 2.492.49Aggregate Score 78.95 | 1.56%Aggregate Score 87.06 | 82.1982.2 | 311 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #9 | 2.392.39Aggregate Score 78.46 | 1.47%Aggregate Score 84.71 | 80.9681.0 | 507 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #10 | 2.772.77Aggregate Score 81.58 | 0.76%Aggregate Score 74.12 | 78.5978.6 | 264 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #11 | 3.463.46Aggregate Score 92.41 | 0.40%Aggregate Score 57.65 | 78.5078.5 | 79 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #12 | 3.383.38Aggregate Score 63.60 | 16.99%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 78.1678.2 | 5,864 teams8 / 13 encounters | ||
| #13 | 3.233.23Aggregate Score 64.84 | 2.88%Aggregate Score 92.94 | 76.0876.1 | 995 teams7 / 13 encounters | ||
| #14 | 2.152.15Aggregate Score 95.99 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 44.71 | 75.4875.5 | 75 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #15 | 3.373.37Aggregate Score 61.66 | 3.20%Aggregate Score 94.12 | 74.6474.6 | 1,105 teams7 / 13 encounters | ||
| #16 | 1.151.15Aggregate Score 96.67 | 0.17%Aggregate Score 37.65 | 73.0673.1 | 33 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #17 | 2.662.66Aggregate Score 66.98 | 1.06%Aggregate Score 81.18 | 72.6672.7 | 212 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #18 | 3.113.11Aggregate Score 73.50 | 0.68%Aggregate Score 69.41 | 71.8671.9 | 233 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #19 | 3.093.09Aggregate Score 56.63 | 1.81%Aggregate Score 88.24 | 69.2769.3 | 624 teams3 / 13 encounters | ||
| #20 | 3.003.00Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 22.35 | 68.9468.9 | 34 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #21 | 2.292.29Aggregate Score 77.20 | 0.34%Aggregate Score 56.47 | 68.9168.9 | 116 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #22 | 0.730.73Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 18.82 | 67.5367.5 | 30 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #23 | 3.933.93Aggregate Score 59.18 | 0.89%Aggregate Score 77.65 | 66.5766.6 | 307 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #24 | 3.163.16Aggregate Score 66.91 | 0.57%Aggregate Score 64.71 | 66.0366.0 | 196 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #25 | 3.463.46Aggregate Score 49.29 | 2.31%Aggregate Score 90.59 | 65.8165.8 | 798 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #26 | 3.273.27Aggregate Score 62.42 | 0.71%Aggregate Score 70.59 | 65.6965.7 | 245 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #27 | 3.623.62Aggregate Score 47.20 | 2.40%Aggregate Score 91.76 | 65.0365.0 | 829 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #28 | 2.502.50Aggregate Score 64.64 | 0.46%Aggregate Score 60.00 | 62.7862.8 | 159 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #29 | 3.213.21Aggregate Score 62.26 | 0.53%Aggregate Score 63.53 | 62.7762.8 | 184 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #30 | 2.892.89Aggregate Score 92.86 | 0.08%Aggregate Score 16.47 | 62.3062.3 | 28 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #31 | 2.152.15Aggregate Score 78.59 | 0.15%Aggregate Score 36.47 | 61.7461.7 | 53 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #32 | 3.023.02Aggregate Score 70.15 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 48.24 | 61.3861.4 | 81 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #33 | 2.562.56Aggregate Score 72.38 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 42.35 | 60.3760.4 | 41 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #34 | 3.603.60Aggregate Score 51.89 | 0.76%Aggregate Score 72.94 | 60.3160.3 | 261 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #35 | 3.783.78Aggregate Score 52.71 | 0.65%Aggregate Score 68.24 | 58.9258.9 | 223 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #36 | 3.063.06Aggregate Score 76.12 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 32.94 | 58.8558.8 | 49 teams2 / 13 encounters | ||
| #37 | 3.633.63Aggregate Score 51.15 | 0.62%Aggregate Score 67.06 | 57.5157.5 | 123 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #38 | 3.833.83Aggregate Score 55.62 | 0.46%Aggregate Score 60.00 | 57.3757.4 | 159 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #39 | 2.622.62Aggregate Score 90.00 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 7.06 | 56.8256.8 | 21 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #40 | 4.144.14Aggregate Score 43.29 | 0.84%Aggregate Score 75.29 | 56.0956.1 | 168 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #41 | 3.823.82Aggregate Score 56.62 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 55.29 | 56.0956.1 | 111 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #42 | 3.103.10Aggregate Score 87.88 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 7.06 | 55.5555.6 | 21 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #43 | 2.672.67Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 18.82 | 55.5355.5 | 30 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #44 | 2.732.73Aggregate Score 58.10 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 49.41 | 54.6254.6 | 49 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #45 | 4.544.54Aggregate Score 81.25 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 12.94 | 53.9353.9 | 24 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #46 | 1.851.85Aggregate Score 86.67 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 53.4153.4 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #47 | 4.134.13Aggregate Score 37.31 | 0.88%Aggregate Score 76.47 | 52.9753.0 | 305 teams4 / 13 encounters | ||
| #48 | 1.901.90Aggregate Score 83.33 | 0.06%Aggregate Score 3.53 | 51.4151.4 | 20 teams1 / 13 encounters | ||
| #49 | 3.743.74Aggregate Score 32.17 | 1.03%Aggregate Score 80.00 | 51.3051.3 | 356 teams5 / 13 encounters | ||
| #50 | 2.902.90Aggregate Score 50.07 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 48.24 | 49.3349.3 | 81 teams2 / 13 encounters |
