Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.5.19 encounters39,030 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #61 | 34,084.1634,084Aggregate Score 43.71 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 61.82 | 50.9551.0 | 125 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #60 | 35,092.4135,092Aggregate Score 76.47 | 0.07%Aggregate Score 16.36 | 52.4352.4 | 29 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #59 | 33,773.0633,773Aggregate Score 38.35 | 0.49%Aggregate Score 73.64 | 52.4652.5 | 193 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #58 | 35,988.5735,989Aggregate Score 83.33 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 7.27 | 52.9152.9 | 21 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #57 | 32,365.7932,366Aggregate Score 25.84 | 2.74%Aggregate Score 93.64 | 52.9653.0 | 1,070 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #56 | 34,283.0334,283Aggregate Score 49.73 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 58.18 | 53.1153.1 | 119 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #55 | 34,702.9634,703Aggregate Score 63.84 | 0.14%Aggregate Score 38.18 | 53.5853.6 | 54 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #54 | 34,262.4034,262Aggregate Score 43.54 | 0.38%Aggregate Score 69.09 | 53.7653.8 | 150 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #53 | 34,363.3134,363Aggregate Score 37.96 | 0.65%Aggregate Score 80.00 | 54.7854.8 | 254 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #52 | 31,577.9131,578Aggregate Score 28.40 | 3.04%Aggregate Score 94.55 | 54.8654.9 | 1,186 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #51 | 36,332.0036,332Aggregate Score 88.24 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 5.45 | 55.1255.1 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #50 | 34,478.5334,479Aggregate Score 44.97 | 0.42%Aggregate Score 70.91 | 55.3455.3 | 163 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #49 | 33,223.0433,223Aggregate Score 41.74 | 0.57%Aggregate Score 76.36 | 55.5955.6 | 224 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #48 | 36,222.1136,222Aggregate Score 77.14 | 0.10%Aggregate Score 26.36 | 56.8356.8 | 38 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #47 | 34,715.5134,716Aggregate Score 45.18 | 0.94%Aggregate Score 82.73 | 60.2060.2 | 365 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #46 | 39,752.0039,752Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.05%Aggregate Score 5.45 | 62.1862.2 | 20 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #45 | 35,168.7135,169Aggregate Score 63.04 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 60.91 | 62.1962.2 | 124 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #43 | 30,836.2130,836Aggregate Score 46.67 | 0.97%Aggregate Score 86.36 | 62.5562.5 | 95 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #44 | 36,610.6136,611Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.13%Aggregate Score 36.36 | 62.5562.5 | 49 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #42 | 35,166.8635,167Aggregate Score 56.03 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 72.73 | 62.7162.7 | 169 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #41 | 34,259.2334,259Aggregate Score 50.26 | 0.74%Aggregate Score 81.82 | 62.8862.9 | 287 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #40 | 35,526.1935,526Aggregate Score 73.59 | 0.22%Aggregate Score 47.27 | 63.0663.1 | 84 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #39 | 33,965.6433,966Aggregate Score 42.68 | 3.14%Aggregate Score 95.45 | 63.7963.8 | 1,226 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #38 | 35,128.3335,128Aggregate Score 57.39 | 0.55%Aggregate Score 74.55 | 64.2564.3 | 216 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #37 | 35,429.3135,429Aggregate Score 70.10 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 56.36 | 64.6064.6 | 116 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #36 | 35,149.9435,150Aggregate Score 60.87 | 0.43%Aggregate Score 71.82 | 65.2565.3 | 167 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #35 | 35,391.9335,392Aggregate Score 71.85 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 55.45 | 65.2965.3 | 114 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #34 | 35,867.8335,868Aggregate Score 76.74 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 50.00 | 66.0466.0 | 92 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #33 | 37,519.0137,519Aggregate Score 81.42 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 45.45 | 67.0367.0 | 81 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #32 | 35,265.7835,266Aggregate Score 79.41 | 0.23%Aggregate Score 49.09 | 67.2867.3 | 90 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #31 | 38,908.4338,908Aggregate Score 82.04 | 0.21%Aggregate Score 46.36 | 67.7767.8 | 83 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #30 | 39,882.3539,882Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.09%Aggregate Score 21.82 | 68.7368.7 | 34 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #29 | 34,493.3334,493Aggregate Score 62.29 | 0.62%Aggregate Score 79.09 | 69.0169.0 | 243 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #28 | 37,500.4737,500Aggregate Score 95.65 | 0.11%Aggregate Score 31.82 | 70.1270.1 | 43 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #27 | 34,054.1234,054Aggregate Score 73.33 | 0.35%Aggregate Score 65.45 | 70.1870.2 | 34 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #26 | 34,983.4934,983Aggregate Score 77.78 | 0.32%Aggregate Score 62.73 | 71.7671.8 | 126 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #25 | 34,334.7634,335Aggregate Score 53.76 | 7.32%Aggregate Score 99.09 | 71.8971.9 | 2,856 teams6 / 9 encounters | ||
| #24 | 34,360.0034,360Aggregate Score 80.00 | 0.31%Aggregate Score 60.00 | 72.0072.0 | 30 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #23 | 37,477.9737,478Aggregate Score 92.77 | 0.20%Aggregate Score 44.55 | 73.4873.5 | 79 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #22 | 35,114.4535,114Aggregate Score 64.58 | 1.09%Aggregate Score 88.18 | 74.0274.0 | 425 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #21 | 35,569.8435,570Aggregate Score 58.98 | 18.52%Aggregate Score 100.00 | 75.3975.4 | 7,229 teams9 / 9 encounters | ||
| #20 | 34,576.3034,576Aggregate Score 90.00 | 0.28%Aggregate Score 53.64 | 75.4575.5 | 27 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #19 | 36,927.6936,928Aggregate Score 67.09 | 1.92%Aggregate Score 90.00 | 76.2676.3 | 749 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #18 | 38,288.1738,288Aggregate Score 94.17 | 0.24%Aggregate Score 50.91 | 76.8676.9 | 93 teams2 / 9 encounters | ||
| #17 | 33,409.4733,409Aggregate Score 64.11 | 4.85%Aggregate Score 98.18 | 77.7477.7 | 473 teams2 / 3 encounters | ||
| #16 | 37,861.6337,862Aggregate Score 94.44 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 52.73 | 77.7677.8 | 98 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #15 | 38,036.7538,037Aggregate Score 78.25 | 0.60%Aggregate Score 78.18 | 78.2378.2 | 234 teams3 / 9 encounters | ||
| #14 | 35,963.5135,964Aggregate Score 76.58 | 0.73%Aggregate Score 80.91 | 78.3178.3 | 285 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #13 | 34,758.6234,759Aggregate Score 93.33 | 0.30%Aggregate Score 57.27 | 78.9178.9 | 29 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #12 | 37,431.9437,432Aggregate Score 86.70 | 0.37%Aggregate Score 67.27 | 78.9378.9 | 144 teams2 / 9 encounters |
