Team Rankings
Explore observed HSR team comps, teammates and team statistics across the latest three published endgame cycles. Team Index balances how often a team appears with how well it performs across recent encounters.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are actually performing best across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we analyze the latest 3 published Endgame cycles and measure how often each team is used, how well it performs, and how consistently it performs across different encounters.
- Eligibility:
MoC, PF and AS require three stars; AA also accepts two stars with 2 < cycles ≤ 4, or one star with cycles > 4. Valid AA zero-cycle clears remain included. A team also needs enough valid observations in an encounter before that encounter counts toward its ranking.
- x / x Encounters:
Shows how many encounters a team qualified for out of the total included in the selected scope.
- Team Identity:
We canonicalize the data so character order does not matter.
A / B / C / DandD / C / B / Aare treated as the same team. - Usage Rate:
How often a team appears across the encounters where it qualifies.
- Avg. Performance:
The average result achieved by that team. Pure Fiction and Apocalyptic Shadow use score-based results, while Memory of Chaos and Anomaly Arbitration use cycles.
- Aggregate Score:
Converts a team's performance across its qualified encounters into a comparable 0–100 score, accounting for differences between individual fights.
- Team Index:
Combines 40% Usage Rate Score and 60% Aggregate Score into a single 0–100 value, highlighting teams that are both commonly used and consistently performing well.
- Coverage:
The number of eligible team observations supporting the ranking.
Data & sources
The dataset we use is open source and maintained by LvlUrArti. We process the source data using our own analytical framework and provide our own interpretation of the Endgame statistics.
MocData datasetChoose E0 Teams or All Teams for the recent three-cycle ranking.
3 cycles4.3.1 → 4.5.19 encounters39,030 teams
| Rank | Team | Avg. Performance | Usage Rate | Team Index | Coverage | Expand team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #11 | 34,561.1134,561Aggregate Score 86.67 | 0.37%Aggregate Score 68.18 | 79.2779.3 | 36 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #10 | 37,011.6737,012Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.25%Aggregate Score 51.82 | 80.7380.7 | 24 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #9 | 36,627.6136,628Aggregate Score 100.00 | 0.29%Aggregate Score 54.55 | 81.8281.8 | 113 teams1 / 9 encounters | ||
| #8 | 34,120.6234,121Aggregate Score 76.67 | 2.63%Aggregate Score 92.73 | 83.0983.1 | 257 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #7 | 36,426.4436,426Aggregate Score 76.86 | 3.59%Aggregate Score 96.36 | 84.6684.7 | 1,401 teams5 / 9 encounters | ||
| #6 | 35,030.5135,031Aggregate Score 83.10 | 1.60%Aggregate Score 89.09 | 85.4985.5 | 156 teams2 / 3 encounters | ||
| #5 | 36,158.0036,158Aggregate Score 96.67 | 0.41%Aggregate Score 70.00 | 86.0086.0 | 40 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #4 | 36,419.3736,419Aggregate Score 78.94 | 4.30%Aggregate Score 97.27 | 86.2786.3 | 1,677 teams8 / 9 encounters | ||
| #3 | 34,531.7034,532Aggregate Score 83.33 | 2.17%Aggregate Score 91.82 | 86.7386.7 | 212 teams1 / 3 encounters | ||
| #2 | 38,760.5338,761Aggregate Score 97.36 | 0.97%Aggregate Score 84.55 | 92.2392.2 | 378 teams4 / 9 encounters | ||
| #1 | 38,260.3438,260Aggregate Score 100.00 | 1.07%Aggregate Score 87.27 | 94.9194.9 | 417 teams1 / 9 encounters |
