Team Rankings
Explore complete teams ranked by observed Usage Rate. Compare the published population, then open a composition to inspect its evidence.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are used most often across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we compare complete four-Character teams across up to the latest 3 published cycles. 2 cycles are currently available. Use Team Comp Finder to explore teams containing a particular Character.
- Eligibility:
A team needs at least 20 observations in at least one independent encounter context to appear. Once it qualifies, its count includes all accepted positive observations across the selected compatible contexts, including smaller fragments. Two samples of 19 alone do not qualify.
- Usage Rate:
A qualifying team's complete count divided by all 286,886 accepted team observations across the selected encounters, including unpublished teams. Counts are pooled before division; equal counts share a rank. Supported-context coverage still counts only contexts with at least 20 observations, not every positive fragment.
- Team identity:
The same four Characters form one team regardless of their order. Overall totals are not added to individual halves or battlefields, and overlapping Stygian difficulty samples are not counted twice.
- Scope:
Both halves of the highest available Abyss floor. These capped published lists show accepted team observations, not unique players or every team played. Absence from a list is not proof of zero use.
- Performance:
This ranking measures usage, not strength. Comparable performance and investment data are unavailable, so it has no Team Index or investment filter.
Data & sources
Data comes from YShelper public aggregate statistics. AstraVoy independently calculates the displayed statistics and creates their visualizations.
Cycle starts: 7.0 · Phase I (2026-08-16); 7.0 · Phase II (2026-09-16). Exact cycle end dates are unavailable.
View YShelperObserved team rankings
2 recent cycles, 286,886 observations, 844 eligible compositions
| Rank | Team | Usage Rate | Observations | Team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1430.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 258 observations | ||
| #1430.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 258 observations | ||
| #1420.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 259 observations | ||
| #1410.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 262 observations | ||
| #1400.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 263 observations | ||
| #1390.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 265 observations | ||
| #1370.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 266 observations | ||
| #1370.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 266 observations | ||
| #1360.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 267 observations | ||
| #1350.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 273 observations | ||
| #1340.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 284 observations | ||
| #1330.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 288 observations | ||
| #1320.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 290 observations | ||
| #1310.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 292 observations | ||
| #1300.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 293 observations | ||
| #1290.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 294 observations | ||
| #1280.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 297 observations | ||
| #1270.10% Usage Rate | 0.10% | 299 observations | ||
| #1260.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 302 observations | ||
| #1240.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 307 observations | ||
| #1240.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 307 observations | ||
| #1220.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 311 observations | ||
| #1220.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 311 observations | ||
| #1210.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 315 observations | ||
| #1200.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 319 observations | ||
| #1190.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 322 observations | ||
| #1180.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 323 observations | ||
| #1160.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 328 observations | ||
| #1160.11% Usage Rate | 0.11% | 328 observations | ||
| #1150.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 330 observations | ||
| #1140.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 331 observations | ||
| #1130.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 338 observations | ||
| #1120.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 341 observations | ||
| #1110.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 342 observations | ||
| #1100.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 345 observations | ||
| #1090.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 355 observations | ||
| #1080.12% Usage Rate | 0.12% | 356 observations | ||
| #1070.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 359 observations | ||
| #1050.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 360 observations | ||
| #1050.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 360 observations | ||
| #1040.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 368 observations | ||
| #1030.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 374 observations | ||
| #1010.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 376 observations | ||
| #1010.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 376 observations | ||
| #1000.13% Usage Rate | 0.13% | 383 observations | ||
| #990.14% Usage Rate | 0.14% | 389 observations | ||
| #980.14% Usage Rate | 0.14% | 394 observations | ||
| #970.14% Usage Rate | 0.14% | 400 observations | ||
| #960.14% Usage Rate | 0.14% | 405 observations | ||
| #950.14% Usage Rate | 0.14% | 406 observations |






















































