Team Rankings
Explore complete teams ranked by observed Usage Rate. Compare the published population, then open a composition to inspect its evidence.
The Team Rankings page is built around answering one question:
Which teams are used most often across recent endgame content?
To answer that, we compare complete four-Character teams across up to the latest 3 published cycles. 2 cycles are currently available. Use Team Comp Finder to explore teams containing a particular Character.
- Eligibility:
A team needs at least 20 observations in at least one independent encounter context to appear. Once it qualifies, its count includes all accepted positive observations across the selected compatible contexts, including smaller fragments. Two samples of 19 alone do not qualify.
- Usage Rate:
A qualifying team's complete count divided by all 286,886 accepted team observations across the selected encounters, including unpublished teams. Counts are pooled before division; equal counts share a rank. Supported-context coverage still counts only contexts with at least 20 observations, not every positive fragment.
- Team identity:
The same four Characters form one team regardless of their order. Overall totals are not added to individual halves or battlefields, and overlapping Stygian difficulty samples are not counted twice.
- Scope:
Both halves of the highest available Abyss floor. These capped published lists show accepted team observations, not unique players or every team played. Absence from a list is not proof of zero use.
- Performance:
This ranking measures usage, not strength. Comparable performance and investment data are unavailable, so it has no Team Index or investment filter.
Data & sources
Data comes from YShelper public aggregate statistics. AstraVoy independently calculates the displayed statistics and creates their visualizations.
Cycle starts: 7.0 · Phase I (2026-08-16); 7.0 · Phase II (2026-09-16). Exact cycle end dates are unavailable.
View YShelperObserved team rankings
2 recent cycles, 286,886 observations, 844 eligible compositions
| Rank | Team | Usage Rate | Observations | Team evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1940.06% Usage Rate | 0.06% | 183 observations | ||
| #1930.06% Usage Rate | 0.06% | 185 observations | ||
| #1920.06% Usage Rate | 0.06% | 186 observations | ||
| #1900.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 187 observations | ||
| #1900.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 187 observations | ||
| #1890.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 189 observations | ||
| #1870.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 190 observations | ||
| #1870.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 190 observations | ||
| #1850.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 194 observations | ||
| #1850.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 194 observations | ||
| #1830.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 195 observations | ||
| #1830.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 195 observations | ||
| #1820.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 200 observations | ||
| #1810.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 201 observations | ||
| #1800.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 203 observations | ||
| #1790.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 206 observations | ||
| #1770.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 208 observations | ||
| #1770.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 208 observations | ||
| #1750.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 209 observations | ||
| #1750.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 209 observations | ||
| #1740.07% Usage Rate | 0.07% | 211 observations | ||
| #1730.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 217 observations | ||
| #1720.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 218 observations | ||
| #1710.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 219 observations | ||
| #1700.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 220 observations | ||
| #1690.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 223 observations | ||
| #1670.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 224 observations | ||
| #1670.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 224 observations | ||
| #1660.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 227 observations | ||
| #1630.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 228 observations | ||
| #1630.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 228 observations | ||
| #1630.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 228 observations | ||
| #1610.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 232 observations | ||
| #1610.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 232 observations | ||
| #1600.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 233 observations | ||
| #1590.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 234 observations | ||
| #1560.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 238 observations | ||
| #1560.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 238 observations | ||
| #1560.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 238 observations | ||
| #1530.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 240 observations | ||
| #1530.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 240 observations | ||
| #1530.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 240 observations | ||
| #1520.08% Usage Rate | 0.08% | 243 observations | ||
| #1500.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 244 observations | ||
| #1500.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 244 observations | ||
| #1480.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 248 observations | ||
| #1480.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 248 observations | ||
| #1470.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 252 observations | ||
| #1460.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 253 observations | ||
| #1450.09% Usage Rate | 0.09% | 255 observations |

















































